Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Biopharm Stat. 2015;25(3):539–547. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.923726

Table 2.

Bias and standard error (SE) of β̂1 and empirical power (PWR) for H0 : β1 = 0

n Censoring
within τ
Jung’s method Optimal method


Bias SE PWR Bias SE PWR
(a) Under H0 : β1 = 0
100 10% 0.042 0.616 0.054 0.042 0.613 0.058
20% 0.003 0.715 0.033 0.004 0.708 0.045
30% 0.014 0.804 0.034 0.015 0.795 0.041
200 10% −0.015 0.430 0.047 −0.015 0.428 0.048
20% 0.035 0.495 0.045 0.035 0.493 0.051
30% 0.003 0.554 0.050 0.005 0.550 0.056
300 10% 0.012 0.350 0.040 0.012 0.350 0.042
20% −0.001 0.400 0.046 −0.001 0.399 0.049
30% 0.006 0.449 0.037 0.006 0.447 0.040
(b) Under H1 : β1 = 2
100 10% 0.126 1.078 0.534 0.101 1.017 0.558
20% 0.137 1.395 0.292 0.080 1.227 0.380
30% 0.146 1.696 0.136 0.108 1.426 0.278
200 10% 0.037 0.719 0.846 0.027 0.698 0.853
20% 0.059 0.880 0.707 0.060 0.829 0.724
30% 0.145 1.099 0.542 0.097 0.982 0.590
300 10% 0.044 0.573 0.964 0.040 0.561 0.965
20% 0.040 0.709 0.865 0.038 0.673 0.878
30% 0.065 0.848 0.732 0.050 0.785 0.769