Table 6. Satisfaction regarding performance of CHWs among people who had received home visits: comparison between baseline and endline evaluations (n = 314).
Baseline(n = 118) | Endline(n = 196) | P | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | ||
CHW visits home every month | 62 | 52.5 | 159 | 81.1 | < 0.001 |
Town | 3 | 12.0 | 77 | 78.6 | |
Remote area | 59 | 63.4 | 82 | 83.7 | |
CHW well understood the health conditions of family members | 61 | 51.7 | 130 | 66.3 | 0.010 |
Town | 5 | 20.0 | 57 | 58.2 | |
Remote area | 56 | 60.2 | 73 | 74.5 | |
Home visits by CHW were helpful | 97 | 82.2 | 186 | 94.9 | < 0.001 |
Town | 14 | 56.0 | 90 | 91.8 | |
Remote area | 83 | 89.2 | 96 | 98.0 | |
Overall performance of the CHW was satisfactory to maintain your and your family’s health | 80 | 67.6 | 171 | 87.2 | < 0.001 |
Town | 6 | 24.0 | 78 | 79.6 | |
Remote area | 74 | 79.6 | 93 | 94.9 |
The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was performed.