Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 2;97(1):54–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.05.005

Table 2.

Frequency of the TED in Worldwide Populations

Populationa Sample Size Zero-Copy Samples (Count) One-Copy Samples (Count) Two-Copy Samples (Count) Methodb Source
ASW 87 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (87) microarray HapMap
CEU 177 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (177) microarray HapMap
CHB 89 0% (0) 6.7% (6) 93.3% (83) microarray HapMap
CHD 90 0% (0) 2.2% (2) 97.8% (88) microarray HapMap
GIH 90 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (90) microarray HapMap
JPT 91 0% (0) 5.5% (5) 94.5% (86) microarray HapMap
LWK 90 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (90) microarray HapMap
MXL 84 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (84) microarray HapMap
MKK 179 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (179) microarray HapMap
TSI 90 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (90) microarray HapMap
YRI 180 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (180) microarray HapMap
KOR 100 0% (0) 4.0% (4) 96.0% (96) microarray this study
Malay 18 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (18) microarray Mokhtar et al.16
Senoi 17 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (17) microarray Mokhtar et al.16
Negrito 12 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (12) microarray Mokhtar et al.16
Han Chinese 80 0% (0) 7.5% (6) 92.5% (74) microarray Lou et al.17
Yao 8 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (8) microarray Lou et al.17
Zhuang 6 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (6) microarray Lou et al.17
Dong 9 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (9) microarray Lou et al.17
Li 8 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (8) microarray Lou et al.17
TIB1 27 55.6% (15) 40.7% (11) 3.7% (1) microarray Simonson et al.4
TIB2 44 43.2% (19) 50.0% (22) 6.8% (3) microarray Peng et al.6
TIB3 46 54.3% (25) 39.1% (18) 6.5% (3) microarray Xu et al.7
Han Chinese 50 0% (0) 4.0% (2) 96.0% (48) LP and SS this study
Kazakh 50 0% (0) 4.0% (2) 96.0% (48) LP and SS this study
Uyghur 50 0% (0) 4.0% (2) 96.0% (48) LP and SS this study
Hui 11 0% (0) 9.1% (1) 90.9% (10) LP and SS this study
Khirghiz 7 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (7) LP and SS this study
Mongolian 8 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (8) LP and SS this study
Ozbek 2 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (2) LP and SS this study
Tatar 2 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (2) LP and SS this study
Tujia 1 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (1) LP and SS this study
Xibe 1 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (1) LP and SS this study
TIB4 70 61.4% (43) 27.1% (19) 11.4% (8) LP and SS this study
ASW 61 0% 0% 100% (61) NGS Abecasis et al.15
CEU 85 0% 0% 100% (85) NGS Abecasis et al.15
CHB 97 0% 4.1% (4) 95.9% (93) NGS Abecasis et al.15
CHS 100 0% 1.0% (1) 99.0% (99) NGS Abecasis et al.15
CLM 60 0% 0% 100% (60) NGS Abecasis et al.15
FIN 93 0% 0% 100% (93) NGS Abecasis et al.15
GBR 89 0% 0% 100% (89) NGS Abecasis et al.15
IBS 14 0% 0% 100% (14) NGS Abecasis et al.15
JPT 89 0% 7.9% (7) 92.1% (82) NGS Abecasis et al.15
LWK 97 0% 0% 100% (97) NGS Abecasis et al.15
MXL 66 0% 0% 100% (66) NGS Abecasis et al.15
PUR 55 0% 0% 100% (55) NGS Abecasis et al.15
TSI 98 0% 0% 100% (98) NGS Abecasis et al.15
YRI 88 0% 0% 100% (88) NGS Abecasis et al.15
Dinka 1 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (1) NGS Meyer et al.40
Mbuti 1 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (1) NGS Meyer et al.40
French 1 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (1) NGS Meyer et al.40
Papuan 1 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (1) NGS Meyer et al.40
Sardinian 1 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (1) NGS Meyer et al.40
Karitians 1 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (1) NGS Meyer et al.40
San 1 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (1) NGS Meyer et al.40
Mandenka 1 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (1) NGS Meyer et al.40
Yoruba 1 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (1) NGS Meyer et al.40
Dai 1 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (1) NGS Meyer et al.40
Han Chinese 1 0% (0) 0% (0) 100% (1) NGS Meyer et al.40
Sherpa 2 100% (2) 0% (0) 0% (0) NGS Jeong et al.41
TIB-Seq 7 57.1% (4) 42.9% (3) 0% (0) NGS this study

Abbreviations are as follows: LP, long PCR; NGS, next-generation sequencing; SS, Sanger sequencing.

a

The full names of the abbreviated populations are listed in the Material and Methods.

b

Experimental methods for detecting or validating the CNV.