Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 21;21(35):10062–10071. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i35.10062

Table 1.

Weaknesses of diagnostic tests of coagulation in liver disease

Primary haemostasis
Platelet count Detects risks of bleeding only at extreme levels
Bleeding time Generally, does not predict bleeding risk
Platelet function analyser Thrombopenia makes the interpretation difficult
Thromboelastometry Little experience in cirrhotic patients
Platelet function assay Aggregometry Thrombopenia makes the interpretation difficult
Membrane molecule expression Specialized laboratory; mostly, in research setting
Soluble activation markers
Platelet adhesion under flow conditions
Molecular mechanisms
Secondary haemostasis
PT and APTT Insensitive to plasma levels of the anticoagulants
Thrombin generation Too complex for use in routine diagnostic laboratories
Thromboelastometry No standardization of parameters in cirrhotic patients
Low predictive positive value
Fibrinolysis
Fibrinolysis markers No clear evidence between hyperfibrinolysis and bleeding in cirrhotic patients
Euglobulin clot lysis time Not widely available

PT: Prothrombin time; APTT: Activated partial thromboplastin time.