Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 10;9:59–80. doi: 10.4137/SART.S30120

Table 1.

Description of study design characteristics.

AUTHOR LAST NAME YEAR OF PUBLICATION NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS STUDY DESIGN INTERVENTION(S) EVALUATED HOW WAS CHRONIC PAIN MEASURED? HOW WAS CHRONIC PAIN DEFINED PATIENTS ON PRESCRIBED OPIOIDS OR ADJUNCT PAIN TREATMENTS
Peles 2005 170 Cross-sectional High-dose methadone (≥60 mg/day) BPI Current pain that lasted for at least 6 months Not reported
Dhingra 2012 489 Cross-sectional High-dose methadone (≥60 mg/day) BPI “Clinically significant pain” was defined by an average pain intensity during the past week of >5 or an average pain interference score during the past week of >5. 82% of the sample is receiving an adjunct pain therapy (not reported by pain status)
Barry 2009 150 Cross-sectional High-dose methadone (≥60 mg/day) BPI Respondents’ answers to BPI items were used to classify them into one of three pain groups: a) “chronic severe pain” (ie, pain lasting at least 6 months with moderate to severe pain intensity or significant pain interference, respondents who had pain lasting at least 6 months and who scored 5 or higher on the item pertaining to the worst pain intensity in the last 7 days or on any of the items relating to pain interference in the last 7 days were considered to exhibit chronic severe pain; b) “some pain” (ie, pain reported in past week but not CSP); and c) “no pain” (ie, no pain reported in the past week and no CSP). Not reported
Bounes 2013 151 Cohort study (prospective or retrospective) Low-dose methadone (<60 mg/day), Low-dose buprenorphine (<16 mg/day) A Visual Analog Scale (VAS) or Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) was used to assess and quantify the intensity of acute pain at the time of admission, after pain management, and just before hospital discharge. Acute pain scores rated from 0 to 10 were obtained indiscriminately from one or the other measurement tool. Acute pain exposure was defined as a pain score greater than 0 at the time of admission on any of the rating scales. Patients without pain: 0%
Patients with pain: 5%
Total sample: 3%
Chakrabarti 2010 69 Cross-sectional High-dose Suboxone® (buprenorphine ≥16 mg/day + naloxone) EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Degree of pain 1 week before induction, measured as pain or discomfort experienced “today” and coded as 0 = no pain, 1 = some pain, or 2 = extreme pain Not explicitly reported (although they removed any patients with prescription medications which may interfere with dosing)
Dennis 2014 235 Cross-sectional High-dose methadone (≥60 mg/day) Self-report Participants were categorized as having chronic and/or comorbid pain if they indicated they were currently experiencing or have been diagnosed with chronic pain Participants on prescribed opioids were removed from analyses
Dreifuss 2013 360 Cross-sectional High-dose Suboxone® (buprenorphine ≥16 mg/day + naloxone) The pain and analgesic use history opiate Not described Not reported (only brief discussion in study selection criteria that they included patients currently prescribed opioids with approval of attending physician)
Dunn 2014 227 Cross-sectional High-dose methadone (≥60 mg/day) BPI Chronic pain was defined as endorsing question 1 of the BPI, which asked, “Have you had pain other than everyday kinds of pain today?” Not reported
Fox 2012 82 Cohort study (prospective or retrospective) High-dose buprenorphine (≥16 mg/day), low-dose buprenorphine (<16 mg/day) BPI The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) asked: “Please rate your pain during the last week by selecting the one number that best describes your pain on the average.” Participants were given a visual analog scale from 0 to 10, with 0 labeled as “no pain” and 10 as “pain as bad as you can imagine.” Similar to prior studies, participants reporting pain scores of ≥5 at the initial interview were considered to have “baseline pain”; those reporting pain scores of ≥5 at all follow-up visits were considered to have “persistent pain” No participants were on prescribed opioids for pain
Jaimison 2000 248 Cross-sectional High-dose methadone (≥60 mg/day), low-dose methadone (<60 mg/day) Self-reported measure (Survey created for study) Not described 77% of sample report being prescribed medications for pain, itemized list of different adjunct therapies is provided (summarized for patients with and without pain). Although no adjusted analyses are performed to evaluate the mediating effects of these on study outcomes
Neumann 2013 54 Randomized controlled trial Low-dose methadone (<60 mg/day), low-dose Suboxone® (buprenorphine <16 mg/day + naloxone) Confirmed by clinical examination and diagnostic imaging The diagnosis of a chronic pain condition originating from the spine or large joints was confirmed by clinical examination and the use of diagnostic imaging (eg, radiographs, computed tomography scan, magnetic resonance imaging) Not reported (patients advised not to continue taking prescribed opioids during course of study)
Potter 2015 252 Cohort study (prospective or retrospective) Low-dose Suboxone® (buprenorphine <16 mg/day + naloxone) BPI Not described Not reported (only brief discussion in study selection criteria that they included patients currently prescribed opioids with approval of attending physician)
Rosenblum 2003 390 Cross-sectional High-dose methadone (≥60 mg/day) BPI To operationally define a subpopulation of patients with chronic pain that was relatively likely to be clinically significant, an index of “chronic severe pain” was defined as a score of 5 or higher on the BPI item “worst pain in the past week” or of 5 or higher on the BPI pain interference scale, and pain duration for at least 6 months. Not reported by pain status
Trafton 2004 251 Cross-sectional High-dose methadone (≥60 mg/day), low-dose methadone (<60 mg/day), high-dose levoacetylmethadol (LAAM) (≥85 mg/day), low-dose levomethadyl acetate hydrochloride (LAAM) (<85 mg/day) SF-36V Quality-of-Life Index Reported pain levels were taken from answers to the SF-36V question “How much body pain have you experienced in the last 4 weeks?”
Patients answered either “none” (n = 45), “very mild” (n = 28), “mild” (n = 48), “moderate” (n = 60), “severe” (n = 56) or “very severe” (n = 13). For analyses patients were split into those reporting none to mild pain (no-pain group, n = 121) and those reporting moderate to very severe pain (pain group, n = 129).
Not reported