Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2015 Aug 6;9:233–243. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.07.008

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

© 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

PMC Copyright notice

Fig. 3 — DIPS responses to approaching vs. withdrawing faces. Posterior views of cortical surface maps of average activation to approaching vs. withdrawing faces for the control subjects (CON, n = 14), schizophrenic patients (SCZ, n = 15) are shown in A. The outlines of the anatomically-defined DIPS region of the cortical surface template is shown in green and labeled. The location of the peak between-group difference in DIPS (SCZ > CON) is indicated with white arrows. Scatter plots of the significant correlations between personal space size and the left and right DIPS responses to approaching vs. withdrawing faces are shown in B (left DIPS: r = .62, p = .013; right DIPS: r = .56, p = .03). After removing one relative outlier evident in these plots who had very high DIPS responses, the correlations remain significant or near significant (left DIPS: r = .54, p = .046; right DIPS: r = .53, p = .051). CON, controls; SCZ, schizophrenic patients; DIPS, dorsal intraparietal sulcus; R, right; A, approaching faces and W, withdrawing faces.