Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 6;97(2):284–290. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.07.002

Table 3.

GWAS Concordance for Type 2 Diabetes Exome Sequencing Data

aˆ No. Samples Ignored Adjusted Paired
Total Concordance

0%–1% 202 0.998 0.998 0.998
1%–5% 293 0.996 0.998 0.998
5%–10% 218 0.958 0.997 0.998
10%–15% 591 0.920 0.993 0.996
15%–20% 169 0.878 0.984 0.992
>20% 30 0.841 0.950 0.971
Total 1,503 0.945 0.993 0.996

Non-reference Concordance

0%–1% 202 0.996 0.997 0.997
1%–5% 293 0.992 0.995 0.995
5%–10% 218 0.908 0.993 0.994
10%–15% 591 0.833 0.985 0.991
15%–20% 169 0.760 0.964 0.983
>20% 30 0.702 0.890 0.936
Total 1,503 0.882 0.985 0.991

r2

0%–1% 202 0.997 0.998 0.998
1%–5% 293 0.994 0.996 0.996
5%–10% 218 0.929 0.995 0.996
10%–15% 591 0.863 0.990 0.994
15%–20% 169 0.791 0.977 0.989
>20% 30 0.725 0.930 0.946
Total 1,503 0.905 0.990 0.994

Mean per-sample genotype accuracy with the GWAS data when we ignore contamination, adjust without regard for the source of contamination, and adjust using known contamination source.