Table 3.
GWAS Concordance for Type 2 Diabetes Exome Sequencing Data
| No. Samples | Ignored | Adjusted | Paired | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Concordance | ||||
| 0%–1% | 202 | 0.998 | 0.998 | 0.998 |
| 1%–5% | 293 | 0.996 | 0.998 | 0.998 |
| 5%–10% | 218 | 0.958 | 0.997 | 0.998 |
| 10%–15% | 591 | 0.920 | 0.993 | 0.996 |
| 15%–20% | 169 | 0.878 | 0.984 | 0.992 |
| >20% | 30 | 0.841 | 0.950 | 0.971 |
| Total | 1,503 | 0.945 | 0.993 | 0.996 |
| Non-reference Concordance | ||||
| 0%–1% | 202 | 0.996 | 0.997 | 0.997 |
| 1%–5% | 293 | 0.992 | 0.995 | 0.995 |
| 5%–10% | 218 | 0.908 | 0.993 | 0.994 |
| 10%–15% | 591 | 0.833 | 0.985 | 0.991 |
| 15%–20% | 169 | 0.760 | 0.964 | 0.983 |
| >20% | 30 | 0.702 | 0.890 | 0.936 |
| Total | 1,503 | 0.882 | 0.985 | 0.991 |
| r2 | ||||
| 0%–1% | 202 | 0.997 | 0.998 | 0.998 |
| 1%–5% | 293 | 0.994 | 0.996 | 0.996 |
| 5%–10% | 218 | 0.929 | 0.995 | 0.996 |
| 10%–15% | 591 | 0.863 | 0.990 | 0.994 |
| 15%–20% | 169 | 0.791 | 0.977 | 0.989 |
| >20% | 30 | 0.725 | 0.930 | 0.946 |
| Total | 1,503 | 0.905 | 0.990 | 0.994 |
Mean per-sample genotype accuracy with the GWAS data when we ignore contamination, adjust without regard for the source of contamination, and adjust using known contamination source.