Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Ther. 2015 Aug 1;73:90–95. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.07.015

Table 3.

Differences between Patients with and without IPC among Those Randomized to the FBT/IPC Condition in terms of the Primary and Secondary Outcomes at EOT

Mean (SD) or Counts (%)
FBT/IPC− (N=23) FBT/IPC+ (N=12) p-value

Primary Outcomes
 Dropout 5 (21.7%) 2 (16.7%) .722
 Number of Sessions 12.6 (4.6) 16.3 (2.1) .012
 Child Suitability 5.5 (3.5) 4.2 (2.9) .295
 Child Expectancy 6.1 (3.1) 4.7 (2.9) .219
 Mother Suitability 7.6 (2.4) 9.0 (1.5) .079
 Mother Expectancy 7.4 (2.3) 8.5 (1.2) .123
 Father Suitability 8.3 (1.7) 8.3 (0.8) .955
 Father Expectancy 8.3 (1.5) 7.9 (1.4) .467
Secondary Outcomes
 Recovery (%IBW >= 95) 10 (47.6%) 7 (58.3%) .554
 Weight 111.5 (16.1) 111.7 (8.0) .955
 BMI 18.9 (1.6) 19.3 (0.9) .487
 %IBW 95.1 (7.6) 96.7 (6.5) .552
 Global EDE 0.7 (1.0) 1.9 (1.7) .013
 CYBOCS Total 2.6 (4.9) 5.9 (7.9) .150
 YBC Total 3.5 (5.1) 8.5 (9.4) .056
 BDI Score 7.9 (10.9) 15.2 (14.2) .151
 Rosenberg Score 22.5 (7.0) 15.7 (9.3) .053
 HRQ score 54.6 (16.5) 40.9 (13.6) .059
**

For group comparisons, we used independent sample t-test for continuous variables and used Pearson chi-square test for the binary variables (dropout and recovery).