Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 16;10(9):e0138064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138064

Table 3. Results of Bayesian model analysis.

Lipid Model Probability Bayes factor
HDL-C BMI SDS 91.89 371265
HDL-C age, BMI SDS 3.08 1041
HDL-C rs4420638dom, BMI SDS 0.99 329
LDL-C rs599839rec, rs4420638rec 53.49 37691
LDL-C rs599839rec, rs4420638rec, BMI SDS 22.88 9720
LDL-C rs4420638rec 7.65 2714
LDL-C rs4420638rec, BMI SDS 4.62 1586
LDL-C rs599839rec 2.54 855
LDL-C rs599839dom, rs4420638rec 1.03 340
LDL-C rs599839rec, rs4420638rec, age 0.8 266
LDL-C rs599839rec, rs4420638rec, rs6102059dom 0.77 254
LDL-C rs599839rec, BMI SDS 0.74 244
LDL-C null 0.56 186
TG age, BMI SDS 90.47 311171
TG rs3812316dom, age, BMI SDS 3.66 1247
TG BMI SDS 2.55 856

Possible models of HDL-C, LDL-C, TG can contain up to 15 covariables (age, sex, BMI SDS, dominant and recessive effect of six SNPs). We present most probable models, corresponding posterior probabilities and Bayes factors. Models are ranked according to their plausibility. A cumulative probability of 95% served as cut-off for model presentation.