Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Anesthesiology. 2015 Oct;123(4):861–872. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000768

Table 3.

Univariate Analysis of Baseline

Predictors of Pain Improvement11 Column1 Column2 Column3
Variable (units) R2 F Significance
Age (years) 0.005 0.26 0.61
Gender (female, male) 0.001 0.06 0.82
Work status (yes, no, retired) 0.014 0.23 0.87
Marital status (yes, no) 0.001 0.07 0.8
Taking opioids at baseline (yes, no) 0.09 4.7 0.04*
Baseline pain (0-10) 0 0.01 0.91
Pain duration (years) 0.01 0.57 0.46
Radicular pain (yes, no)1 0.009 0.24 0.79
Neuropathic pain (yes, no)2 0.04 0.94 0.4
Pain interference (0-10)3 0.12 7.2 .01*
Function (0-100%)4 0.003 0.16 0.67
Opioid misuse risk score (0-96)5 0.17 9.9 .003*
Substance abuse history (yes, no) 0.015 0.78 0.38
Pain catastrophizing (0-52)7 0.05 0.12 0.74
Neuroticism (T score)11 0.02 1.2 0.28
1

Intermittent only per history (not constant or daily)

2

Composite measure of burning, shooting, and sensitivity to touch symptoms, assessed with the Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire

3

Average of the pain interfence items on the Brief Pain Inventory

4

Oswestry Disability Index

5

Screener for Opioid Assessment in Patients with Pain, Revised (SOAPP-R). Score >14 predicts a high likihood of future opioid misuse

6 Results of the MINI neuropsychiatric structured interview

7

Pain Catastrophizing Scale

8

Neuroticism Subscale of the NEO Personality Inventory ‘T’ scores above 60= >85th percentile for neuroticism

9 Depression subscale of the HADS

10 Anxiety subscale of the HADS

11

Average weekly percent improvement in pain during the opioid continuation period

*

Continued to ANCOVA stage of testing