Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2015 Apr 3;26(4):387–398. doi: 10.1016/j.jana.2015.03.005

Table 4.

Individual Study Findings of Postmenopausal Status and Low BMD or Fractures in HIV Infection

Author Outcome Variable Findings (95% CI) Significant Predictors in Multivariate Models
OR/PR of low BMD or osteoporosis
Anastos et al. (2007) Low BMD (T-score <–1.0) and osteoporosis (T-score <–2.5) at LS or FN in HIV+ PoM versus HIV+ PrM OR low BMD: 3.2 (1.6 to 6.2)
OR osteoporosis: 4.8 (1.2 to 18.9)
ART-naïve, HIV on ART with PI, postmenopause
Cazanave et al. (2008) Low BMD (T-score < –1.0) at LS or FN in HIV+ PoM versus HIV+ PrM OR low BMD: 1.2 (0.54 to 2.7)b
OR osteoporosis: 7.1 (1.9 to 26.4)b
Older age, nadir CD4 cell count
Gomes et al. (2014) d Low BMD (T-score <–1.0) at LS and FN in HIV+ PoM versus HIV+ PrM or perimenopausal PR low BMD LS: 23.3 (7.3 to 74.2)
PR low BMD FN: 56.7 (7.9 to 409.4)
Postmenopause
Pinto Neto et al. (2011) d Odds of low BMD (T-score <–1.0) at LS, FN, or total hip in HIV+/PoM versus HIV+ men and women not PoM OR: 13.4 (2.5 to 71.1) Male, lower BMI, postmenopause, undetectable viral load
Yin et al. (2005) c Osteoporosis (T-score < –2.5) at LS, FN, and non-dominant radius in HIV+ PoM versus HIV– PoM OR osteoporosis: 2.4 (1.1 to 5.3)b Years since menopause, lowest historical weight
Change in BMD
Jacobson et al. (2008) Annual percent change in total body BMD in HIV+ PoM versus HIV+ PrM PoM: –1.0 (–1.7 to –0.34)a
PrM: 0.12 (–0.16 to 0.41)a
Postmenopause, low albumin (mg/dL), lower BMI, no strength training, prednisone/hydrocortisone use, time on ART (d4T, ddi, tenofovir, saquinavir)
Li Vecchi et al. (2012) Correlation between postmenopause and BMD T-score at LS and FN Correlation coefficient
LS = –0.17a
Correlation coefficient
FN =–0.17a
HIV/HCV co-infection, older age, low yogurt intake, nadir CD4, drug addiction
Sharma et al. (2011) Annual change in BMD (g/cm2) at LS, FN, and total hip associated with PoM in HIV+ LS: –0.010 (–0.019 to –0.001)
FN: –0.007 (–0.014 to 0.000)
TH: –0.016 (–0.024 to –0.008)
Postmenopause, methadone use, baseline BMD, lower BMI, no protease inhibitor use
HR of fractures
Yin et al. (2010) Self-reported fragility and nonfragility fractures in HIV+ PoM versus HIV– PoM HR: 1.5 (1.1 to 2.2)a Older age, white race, HIV/HCV co-infection, higher serum creatinine
Yin et al. (2012) d Self-reported fragility and nonfragility fractures in HIV+ PoM and perimenopausal versus HIV+ PrM HR: 5.8 (1.4 to 23.3)a Bisphosphonate use, HIV/HCV co-infection, current smoking, glucocorticoid use

Note. ART = antiretroviral therapy; BMD = bone mineral density; BMI = body mass index; FN = femoral neck; HCV = hepatitis C virus; HIV+ = HIV-infected; HIV– = HIV uninfected; HR= hazard ratio; LS = lumbar spine; OR = odds ratio; PoM = postmenopausal; PeriM = perimenopausal; PrM = premenopausal; PR = prevalence ratio.

a

Unadjusted model.

b

Calculated by reviewer (YC) from information available in article.

c

Study population limited to postmenopausal women.

d

Study population limited to HIV-infected ART-naïve women.