Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 18.
Published in final edited form as: Natl Health Stat Report. 2015 Feb 10;(79):1–16.

Table 1.

Trends in the use of selected complementary health approaches during the past 12 months, by type of approach: United States, 2002, 2007, and 2012

Complementary health approach 2002
2007
2012
Test for trend
Percentage point change Trend
Number (in
thousands)
Age-adjusted
percent1
(standard
error)
Number (in
thousands)
Age-adjusted
percent1
(standard
error)
Number (in
thousands)
Age-adjusted
percent1
(standard
error)
2002–2007 2007–2012 2002–2012
Nonvitamin, nonmineral dietary supplements 38,183 18.9 (0.28) 38,797 17.7 (0.37) 40,579 17.7 (0.37) †† 0.0 †† ††
Deep-breathing exercises2 23,457 11.6 (0.24) 27,794 12.7 (0.30) 24,218 10.9 (0.26) §1.1 †† †† ††
Yoga, tai chi, and qi gong 11,766 5.8 (0.17) 14,436 6.7 (0.22) 22,281 10.1 (0.25) 0.9 §2.5 §3.4 * Linear
Chiropractic or osteopathic manipulation3 15,226 7.5 (0.19) 18,740 8.6 (0.27) 19,369 8.4 (0.22) †† −0.2 †† ††
Meditation4 15,336 7.6 (0.20) 20,541 9.4 (0.27) 17,948 8.0 (0.21) §1.8 †† †† ††
Massage therapy 10,052 5.0 (0.16) 18,068 8.3 (0.23) 15,411 6.9 (0.15) §3.3 §−1.6 §1.9 * Quadratic
Special diets5 6,765 3.3 (0.12) 6,040 2.8 (0.14) 6,853 3.0 (0.13) 0.1 §−0.6 −0.5 ** Quadratic
Homeopathic treatment6 3,433 1.7 (0.09) 3,909 1.8 (0.11) 5,046 2.2 (0.11) 0.1 0.4 0.5 *** Linear
Progressive relaxation 6,185 3.0 (0.12) 6,454 2.9 (0.15) 4,766 2.1 (0.10) −0.1 §−0.8 §−0.9 * Linear
Guided imagery 4,194 2.1 (0.10) 4,866 2.2 (0.16) 3,846 1.7 (0.10) 0.1 −0.5 −0.4 None
Acupuncture 2,136 1.1 (0.07) 3,141 1.4 (0.10) 3,484 1.5 (0.08) 0.3 0.1 0.4 *** Linear
Energy healing therapy 1,080 0.5 (0.05) 1,216 0.5 (0.06) 1,077 0.5 (0.05) 0.0 0.0 0.0 None
Naturopathy 498 0.2 (0.03) 729 0.3 (0.04) 957 0.4 (0.04) 0.1 0.1 0.2 ** Linear
Hypnosis 505 0.2 (0.03) 561 0.2 (0.04) 347 0.1 (0.03) 0.0 −0.1 −0.1 None
Biofeedback 278 0.1 (0.02) 362 0.2 (0.04) 281 0.1 (0.02) 0.1 −0.1 0.0 None
Ayurveda 154 0.1 (0.02) 214 0.1 (0.03) 241 0.1 (0.02) 0.0 0.0 0.0 None

Estimates are considered unreliable. Data have a relative standard error greater than 30% and less than or equal to 50% and should be used with caution.

††

Direct comparisons are not available.

§

Difference between both years is statistically significant at p < 0.05.

0.0 Quantity more than zero but less than 0.05.

*

Significance of the chi-squared statistics is < 0.001.

**

Significance of the chi-squared statistics is < 0.01.

***

Significance of the chi-squared statistics is < 0.05.

1

The denominator used in the calculation of percentages was all sample adults.

2

In 2012, deep-breathing exercises included deep-breathing exercises as part of hypnosis; biofeedback; Mantra meditation (including Transcendental Meditation, Relaxation Response, and Clinically Standardized Meditation); mindfulness meditation (including Vipassana, Zen Buddhist meditation, mindfulness-based stress reduction, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy); spiritual meditation (including centering prayer and contemplative meditation); guided imagery; progressive relaxation; yoga; tai chi; or qi gong. In 2002 and 2007, the use of deep-breathing exercises was asked broadly and not if used as part of other complementary health approaches. No trend analyses were conducted on the use of deep-breathing exercises.

3

In 2002, the use of chiropractic care was asked broadly, and osteopathic approach was not specified on the survey. No trend analyses were conducted on the use of chiropractic or osteopathic manipulation.

4

In 2012, meditation included Mantra meditation (including Transcendental Meditation, Relaxation Response, and Clinically Standardized Meditation); mindfulness meditation (including Vipassana, Zen Buddhist meditation, mindfulness-based stress reduction, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy); spiritual meditation (including centering prayer and contemplative meditation); and meditation used as a part of other practices (including yoga, tai chi, and qi gong). In 2002 and 2007, the use of meditation was asked broadly and not if practiced as part of other complementary health approaches.

5

Respondents used one or more named special diets for 2 weeks or more in the past 12 months. Special diets included vegetarian (including vegan), macrobiotic, Atkins, Pritikin, and Ornish diets.

6

No distinction was made between persons who sought treatment from a homeopathic practitioner and those who self-medicated.

NOTES: Estimates were age-adjusted using the projected 2000 U.S. population as the standard population and using four age groups: 18–24, 25–44, 45–64, and 65 and over. The denominators for statistics shown exclude persons with unknown complementary and alternative medicine information. Estimates are based on household interviews of a sample of the civilian noninstitutionalized population.

SOURCE: CDC/NCHS, National Health Interview Survey, 2002, 2007, and 2012.