Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 18.
Published in final edited form as: Int Urogynecol J. 2015 May 21;26(7):991–996. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2583-7

Table 3.

Pelvic floor strength in relation to various domains of the PISQ-IR and FSFI scales of sexual function.

Patient characteristics Weak
N=173
Strong
N=207
P Value
Age years +/− SD (N) 53.3 ± 11.5 (160) 51.3 ± 11.3 (201) 0.11
Has Partner (%) 143/160 (89.4) 165/201 (82.1) 0.05
BMI, kg/m2±SD (N) 27.7 ± 4.9 (160) 27.7 ± 5.1 (186) 0.91
Postmenopausal (%) 104/168 (61.9) 100/205 (48.8) 0.01
Gravidity, mean ± SD (N) 2.9 ± 1.48 (172) 2.84 ± 1.6 (206) 0.63
Parity mean ± SD (N) 2.5 ± 1.2 (172) 2.34 ± 1.2 (206) 0.19
Mode of Delivery 0.32
 All Vaginal 149/167(89.2) 161/192(83.9)
 All Cesarean 4/167(2.4) 7/192(3.7)
 Both Vaginal and Cesarean 14/167(8.4) 24/192(12.5)
POPQ ≥ stage 2 (%) 67/166 (40.4) 57/201 (28.3) 0.02
Latino or Hispanic (%) 13/112 (11.6) 18/154 (11.7) 1.0
White Race (%) 143/160 (89.4) 177/199 (88.9) 0.38
Stress Urinary Incontinence (%) 116/173 (67.1) 151/207 (73.0) 0.22
Urgency Incontinence 87/173 (50.3) 86/207 (41.6) 0.10
Mixed urinary incontinence (%) 75/173 (43.4) 71/207 (34.3) 0.07
Anal incontinence (%) 15/173 (8.7) 21/207 (10.1) 0.73
Diabetes (%) 7/172 (4.07) 14/206 (6.8) 0.27
Neurologic Disease (%) 4/171 (2.3) 11/205 (5.4) 0.19
Education: Some College or More (%) 105/154 (68.2) 143/199 (71.9) 0.48