. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 18.

Published in final edited form as: Int Urogynecol J. 2015 May 21;26(7):991–996. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2583-7

Table 5.

“Best” multivariate models of sexually active patients looking at strength and potential confounders. For each domain, listed are independent predictors after multivariate logistic regression.

		Parameter Estimate +/− SE	P value
FSFI Domains	FSFI Total
	Postmenopausal	−2.01+/−0.64	0.002
	POPQ >/= 2	−1.50+/−0.68	.03
	Desire
	Postmenopausal	−0.38+/−0.14	0.005
	Partner	−1.17+/−0.19	<−0.001
	Lubrication
	Postmenopausal	−0.89+/−0.17	<0.001
	Partner	−0.58+/−0.24	0.02
	Orgasm
	Strength	0.51+/−0.17	0.004
PISQ-IR Domains	Condition Impact
	Strength	0.20+/−0.09	0.04
	Partner	−0.36+/−0.01	<0.001
	Desire
	Age	−0.01+/−0.003	<0.001
	POPQ >/= 2	−0.76+/−0.12	<0.001

Reported as parameter estimate +/− standard error (p value).

^**

Bonferroni correction is made by comparing P-values to alpha=0.05/5=0.01