Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 16;10(9):e0137742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137742

Table 2. Physical activity levels throughout the study.

Baseline at 14 weeks End of program at 28 weeks Follow-up at 36 weeks ANOVA result
Mean ± SD or n (%) Exercise group Control group Exercise group Control group Exercise group Control group P-value for interaction
Accelerometry, n 23 22 20 17 18 16 -
MVPA in bouts, min/d 19.9 ± 15.0 16.8 ± 17.6 25.4 ± 20.4 11.7 ± 9.5 18.9 ± 14.1 9.5 ± 9.8 0.064 a
Counts per day (n x 104) 22.0 ± 6.7 21.8 ± 7.3 22.8 ± 8.3 19.2 ± 4.5 20.1 ± 6.2 15.8 ± 5.2 0.023
Steps per day 5587 ± 1472 5984 ± 1806 5598 ± 2094 5298 ± 1252 4947 ± 1349 4006 ± 1157 0.028
Self-reported PA, n 25 25 23 22 23 22 -
Total energy expenditure, METs·h/wk 194.6 ± 71.2 226.0 ± 60.0 218.1 ± 67.8 207.8 ± 72.6 185.0 ± 50.8 186.8 ± 83.6 0.070 b
Energy expenditure by intensity, METs·h/wk - - - - - - -
Sedentary 74.4 ± 27.3 79.9 ± 27.3 69.1 ± 28.9 66.4 ± 30.9 62.9 ± 25.3 63.5 ± 25.5 0.65 c
Light 71.8 ± 46.7 86.7 ± 32.5 89.7 ± 41.2 86.3 ± 35.2 73.6 ± 27.7 78.7 ± 43.6 0.23
Moderate 46.3 ± 33.7 56.8 ± 37.0 48.5 ± 30.8 54.4 ± 45.1 41.6 ± 25.3 43.8 ± 37.9 0.64
Vigorous 2.2 ± 3.4 2.6 ± 8.0 10.7 ± 7.1 0.8 ± 2.0 6.9 ± 5.9 0.8 ± 1.9 <0.0001
Energy expenditure by type, METs·h/wk - - - - - - -
Household and care giving 71.7 ± 61.5 91.7 ± 55.4 82.5 ± 52.8 86.7 ± 60.4 75.3 ± 43.4 86.2 ± 76.8 0.39
Occupational activity 55.6 ± 41.4 62.3 ± 43.2 62.1 ± 47.3 48.8 ± 55.4 39.7 ± 39.9 27.7 ± 39.1 0.21 d
Sports and exercise 10.2 ± 8.625 8.6 ± 9.9 22.4 ± 13.2 8.4 ± 6.2 15.5 ± 11.2 9.3 ± 7.6 0.002
Transportation 21.6 ± 16.9 22.2 ± 12.9 23.3 ± 15.8 25.1 ± 18.4 20.4 ± 12.6 21.0 ± 16.1 0.97

MVPA = moderate and vigorous physical activity; PA = physical activity

asignificant group effect, p = 0.014; values significantly higher in the exercise vs control group at all time

bsignificant time effect, p = 0.028; values significantly lower at time 3 compared with time 2 in both groups (adjusted p = 0.027)

csignificant time effect, p = 0.012; values significantly lower at time 3 compared with time 1 in both groups (adjusted p = 0.012)

dsignificant time effect, p = 0.007; values significantly lower at time 3 vs time 1 and time 2 in both groups (adjusted p = 0.001 and p = 0.010).