Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 Aug;124(3):576–588. doi: 10.1037/abn0000053

Table 3.

Correlations between Online Social Communication and Other Study Variables

Measure 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1. Preference for online
communication (W3)
.479** −.104 −.174 −.059 .425** .012 .038 .280** −.279**
2. Interaction with strangers
online (W3)
−.054 −.283** −.278** .453** .031 −.101 .236** −.093
3. Number of Facebook
friendsa (W3)
.082 .206* −.239* −.064 .074 .108 .235**
4. Connection with Facebook
friends (W3)
.425** −.316** .035 .183* −.090 .175
5. Support from Facebook
friends (W3)
−.161 .002 .129 −.075 .138
6. Peer impairment compositeb
(W1/W2)
−.087 −.117 .165* −.582**
7. Age (W3) −.016 .008 −.031
8. Household income (W1) −.018 .110
9. Total time using online
social communication (W3)
.024
10. Positive peer relationshipsc
(W3)

Note. W1 = Wave 1; W2 = Wave 2; W3 = Wave 3.

a

This variable was square root transformed to yield an approximately normal distribution.

b

This variable is an averaged z-score of the W1 peer sociometric preference measure and W2 teacher report of peer acceptance, multiplied by −1.

c

Assessed on Peer Attachment subscale of the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01