Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 Aug;124(3):606–622. doi: 10.1037/abn0000071

Table 5.

Parameter estimates from bivariate main effect and interaction models of past-year gambling involvement and disorder and local area disadvantage.

Men Women
Main effects model Interaction model Main effects model Interaction model
Parameter estimate estimate 90% CI estimate estimate 90% CI
Any gambling
ac .16 .17 .04, .29 .19 .21 .07, .35
ec .02 .01 -.06, .07 .01 .03 -.03, .08
au .69 .68 .61, .75 .66 .65 .58, .72
eu .69 .69 .64, .73 .71 .71 .67, .74
ac′ -- -.06 -.19, .07 -- -.11 -.22, .00
ec′ -- .06 -.02, .15 -- -.01 -.07, .06
au′ -- .04 -.03, .12 -- .00 -.07, .07
eu′ -- .02 -.04, .07 -- .04 -.01, .08
Electronic gambling machines
ac .26 .26 .12, .40 .27 .28 .13, .42
ec .03 .02 -.05, .09 .04 .05 .01, .10
au .75 .74 .66, .82 .67 .66 .59, .73
eu .73 .73 .68, .77 .58 .57 .54, .60
ac′ -- .02 -.13, .16 .04 -.08, .16
ec′ -- .01 -.10, .11 -.06 -.12, .01
au′ -- .09 .01, 17 .04 -.02, .11
eu′ -- .06 -.01, .12 .15 .10, .19
Disordered gambling
ac .05 .63 -.01, 1.0 .16 .16 .05, .27
ec .09 .04 -.05, .12 .05 .07 .02, .12
au .69 .13 -1.0, 1.0 .57 .57 .51, .62
eu .80 .76 .70, .81 .68 .68 .64, .71
ac′ -- .06 -2.0, 2.1 -- -.02 -.12, .08
ec′ -- .06 -.06, .19 -- -.03 -.09, .03
au′ -- -.35 -.71, .02 -- .06 .01, .12
eu′ -- .04 -.02, .09 -- .05 .01, .09

Note: The parameters listed in the first column correspond to eight of the ten paths depicted in Figure 1 (paths specific to local area disadvantage [ad, cd, and ed] are not shown). CI = confidence interval. Estimates in bold are significantly greater than zero at p < .05, underlined estimates are significantly greater than zero at p < .10. Ninety-percent confidence intervals are presented for the interaction models to indicate the precision of the estimates.