Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurol. 2015 Jun 17;262(9):2064–2072. doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-7821-5

Table 1.

Subject demographics

Total progressive apraxia of speech cohort (n=24) PPAOS subset (n=15) Controls (n=20)
Age at baseline MRI, years 72 (65–76) 74 (67–76) 72 (67–76)
Gender, % female 15 (62%) 8 (53%) 11 (55%)
Scan interval, years 2 (1.5–2.4) 2 (1.7–2.6) 2 (1.7–2.6)
Disease duration, years 4 (2.6–4.9) 4 (2.9–5.4) NA
ASRS at baseline (/64, 0 normal) 16 (12–23) 16 (12–20) NA
ASRS at follow-up (/64, 0 normal)a 26 (20–31) 25 (20–31) NA
MSD scale at baseline (/10, 10 normal) 7 (6–8) 7 (7–8) NA
MSD scale at follow-up (/10, 10 normal) 6 (4–6) 6 (4–6) NA
WAB-AQ at baseline (/100, 100 normal) 95 (85–98) 97 (95–100) NA
WAB-AQ at follow-up (/100, 100 normal)b 87 (82–96) 96 (87–97) NA

Data shown as median (inter-quartile range); ASRS = Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale; MSD = Motor Speech Disorder scale; WAB – AQ = Western Aphasia Battery Aphasia Quotient; no significant differences were observed between progressive apraxia of speech and controls or between PPAOS and controls.

a

Two patients (one diagnosed with PPAOS) were unable to complete the ASRS at follow-up.

b

Four patients (two diagnosed with PPAOS) were unable to complete the WAB-AQ at follow-up