Table 1.
Correlation coefficients | ||
---|---|---|
CEVd and HSVd | ||
Numbers of citrus plants | Tissues | Nonparametric methodsa |
17 citrus plants | All | ++b |
7 citrus plantsd | All | ++ |
11 Blood oranges | Roots | -c |
Rootstock bark | ++ | |
Twig bark | - | |
Leaves | ++ | |
6 Murcott mandarins | Roots | ++ |
Rootstock bark | ++ | |
Twig bark | - | |
Leaves | - | |
Double infectionse | Roots | ++ |
Rootstock bark | ++ | |
Twig bark | ++ | |
Leaves | ++ | |
12 citrus plantsf (Sets in greenhouse) | All | ++ |
aThree nonparametric methods are Spearman’s nonparametric correlation coefficient, Kendall tau rank correlation coefficient and Hoeffding’s inequality
bcorrelation coefficients marked with “++” are statistically significant by all three methods; those marked with “+” are statistically significant by two of three methods
cindicates no significant difference
dThere were no underdetermined values in this data set including 3 Blood oranges and 4 Murcott mandarins
eincludes 5 Blood oranges and 4 Murcott mandarins
fArtificially double inoculated plants include 6 Blood oranges and 6 Murcott mandarins