Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug;77(3):347–353.

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients and summary of preoperative TAE

Case Age/Sex Location
of tumor
Size of
tumor
(cm)
Target
feeding artery
Microcatheter Amount
of 14% NBCA
(ml)
Complication of TAE Interval
to
surgery (days)
Effectiveness of TAE
1 80/F Lt convexity 5.5×3.3×3.5 MMA, STA Echlon 10 0.4 None 1 Excellent
2 79/M Rt parasagittal 5.3×4.1×4.6 MMA Marathon 0.55 None 1 Excellent
3 52/F Lt falx 3.4×3.4×3.6 MMA Marathon 0.6 None 2 Excellent
4 71/F Lt parasagittal 3.6×3.4×2.6 MMA Marathon 0.5 None 2 Excellent
5 78/M Rt parasagittal 2.1×1.9×1.7 MMA Marathon 0.3 None 2 Excellent
6 49/F Lt falx 2.8×2.8×3.4 MMA Marathon 0.25 None 2 Excellent
7 65/F Lt CPA 2.9×2.8×2.6 MMA Echlon 10 0.4 None 1 Good
8 56/F Lt olfactory 5.2×5.5×4.8 MMA, STA Marathon 1.1 None 2 Good
9 66/F Lt parasellar 2.5×2.1×2.2 MMA, AMA Marathon 0.4 None 2 Poor
10 73/F Lt convexity 4.3×3.6×2.9 MMA Marathon 0.35 None 2 Excellent
11 51/M Falx 2.1×3.0×1.9 MMA Marathon 0.3 None 1 Excellent
12 46/M Rt CPA 3.3×1.9×3.4 APA Headway 0.4 None 1 Good
13 40/F Lt CPA 4.9×4.6×4.9 OA Marathon 0.5 None 2 Excellent
14 63/M Lt convexity 1.8×2.3×1.4 MMA Marathon 0.4 None 2 Excellent
15 45/F Rt CPA 3.9×3.9×3.7 OA, PA, MMA Marathon 0.6 None 1 Excellent
16 50/M Rt sphenoid 4.0×3.6×3.8 MMA Headway 0.5 None 2 Excellent
17 66/F Rt petroclival 3.9×3.2×2.9 MMA Headway 0.35 None 2 Poor
18 59/F Rt parasagittal 3.5×3.4×3.4 MMA, STA Marathon 0.4 None 1 Good
19 69/F Rt convexity 3.2×4.0×4.0 MMA Marathon 0.15 None 1 Excellent

APA: ascending pharyngeal artery, CPA: cerebellopontine angle, 4.9F: female, Lt: left, M: male, MMA: middle meningeal artery, NBCA: n-butyl cyanoacrylate, OA: occipital artery,

PA: posteror auricular artery, Rt: right, STA: superficial temporal artery, TAE: trans-arterial embolization