Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug;77(3):481–492.

Table 1.

Review of the Literature: Summary of 44 cases of Hemorrhagic Lumbar Synovial Cysts

Authors/Year Age/Gender Level Symptom Duration Back
Pain
Leg
Pain
Weakness Sensory Change Decreased Reflexes Other MRI*
(T1/T2)
Surgical Treatment – Laminectomy Follow-
up
Outcome Applied Macnab Score†
Brish
and Payan, 19725)
51/M L4-L5 3 mo + + + + NR Complete resolution of presenting symptoms Excellent
Pendleton et al., 198331) 50/F L3-L4 3 mo -> 2wks + + + + + + 1 mo Improved symptoms Good
Kjerulf et al., 198619) 56/F L5-S1 5 mo + + + + 1 yr Complete resolution of presenting symptoms Excellent
Franck et al., 198712) 62/F L4-L5 2 mo + + + NR Complete resolution of presenting symptoms Excellent
Onofrio and Mih, 198827) 64/F L4-L5 3 mo + + + + 3 mo Pain free Excellent
71/F L4-L5 3 mo + + + 3 mo Mild residual foot pain Good
Reust et al., 198835) 77/F L4-L5 1 mo + + + 1 y Complete resolution of presenting symptoms Excellent
24/M L4-L5 5 mo + + + 1 yr Progressive improvement Good
Eyster and
Scott, 198910)
60/M L4-L5 3 mo + + + NR Complete resolution of presenting symptoms Excellent
Lemish et al., 198920) 78/F L5-S1 3 mo + + NR Complete resolution of presenting symptoms Excellent
53/M L4-L5 21 d + spinal claudication + NR Complete resolution of presenting symptoms Excellent
Rousseaux et al., 198936) 29/M L5-S1 7 mo + + NR NR NR
Jackson
et al., 198916)
NR/NR L4-L5 NR + + Hi/Hi + NR Improvement in pain and relief of radiculopathy Good
Summers and
Quint, 199238)
60/M L2-L3 6 mo + + + hHi/hLo + NR NR NR
Tatter
and Cosgrove, 199441)
59/M L3-L4 5 d + + + + Hi/hLo + 2 mo Complete resolution of presenting symptoms Excellent
Yarde et al., 199547) 42/M L5-S1 12 mo + + NR + 4 mo Improved symptoms Good
Howling and Kessel, 199715) 51/M L4-L5 21 d + + + + + hHi/hHi + NR Complete resolution of presenting symptoms Excellent
Radatz et al., 199732) 65/M L4-L5 >1 mo + + + + Lo/Hi + 1 mo Complete resolution of presenting symptoms Excellent
Henriet
and Nobourgh, 199813)
56/F L4-L5 14 d + + + NR NR NR
Bandiera et al., 19993) 81/F L3-L4 4 mo + + + spinal claudication Hi/hHi + 1 yr Complete resolution of presenting symptoms Excellent
Kaneko and
Inoue, 200017)
55/M L3-L4 6 mo -> 3 d + + + + Hi/NR + 2.5 yr Complete resolution of presenting symptoms Excellent
Wang et al., 200445) 76/F L4-L5 4 mo -> few days + Hi/Lo + NR Complete resolution of pain Excellent
82/F L4-L5 3 mo -> 24 hr + + + Hi/Lo + NR Complete resolution of pain Excellent
Eck and Triantafyllou, 20059) 77/M L3-L4 2 wk + + + NR/Hi + 1 yr Complete resolution of presenting symptoms Excellent
Wait et al., 200544) 62/M L3-L4 6 mo -> 2 mo + + + Hi/NR + NR Full recovery Excellent
69/M L3-L4 8 mo -> 2 wk + + + + + urinary retention Hi/NR + 4 mo Full recovery Excellent
Khan et al., 200518) NR/NR NR NR NR
NR/NR NR NR NR
Ramieri et al., 200634) 71/F L5-S1 15 d + + + + hHi/NR + 1 yr Complete resolution of presenting symptoms Excellent
75/F L3-L4 10 d + + + + + hHi/NR + 1 yr Recovery of sensation, reflexes. Partial recovery of strength Good
68/M L4-L5 14 d + + hHi/NR + 2 yr No radicular pain, continued back pain Good
Nourbakhsh and Garges, 200726) 67/M L4-L5 1.5 mo + + + + clonus Hi/hLo + 1 yr Complete resolution of presenting symptoms Excellent
Arantes et al., 20082) 61/M L4-L5 2 mo -> 8 d + + + Hi/Lo + 6 mo Complete resolution of neurological symptoms Excellent
Miyatake et al., 200925) 86/M L1-L2 3 mo -> 1mo + Hi/Hi + NR Complete resolution of neurological symptoms Excellent
56/M L4-L5 1 mo -> 4 d + + cauda equina Hi/Hi + NR Complete resolution of neurological symptoms Excellent
84/M L4-L5 2 mo -> 1 mo + + Hi/Hi + NR Complete resolution of neurological symptoms Excellent
57/M L5-S1 3 mo -> 2 mo + Hi/Hi + NR Complete resolution of neurological symptoms Excellent
Cicuendez et al., 20107) 72/F L3-L4 3 mo -> 1 wk + + + + Hi/h + ~4 wk Full recovery Excellent
Utsunomiya et al., 201143) 65/F L3-L4 2 mo -> days + + + + hHi/Lo + 1 yr Complete recovery Excellent
Xu et al., 201146) 68/M L3-L4 4 mo -> 1 wk + + + + Hi/Lo + 8 mo Resolution of majority of radicular symptoms Good
Tofuka et al., 201142) 84/M L4-L5 >2 mo + + + urinary disturbance Hi/h + 1 wk Symptoms improved, Pt could walk without support at 1 wk post-op Good
Park et al., 201230) 72/F L2-L3 acute + + Hi/Lo + 1 mo Full recovery Excellent
Machino et al., 201222) 65/M L2-L3 3 mo -> 1 wk + + + mild incontinence of bowel and bladder Hi/Lo + 1 mo Full recovery Excellent
Hoover and
Pirris, 201414)
68/F S1-S2 3 wk + + + Lo/Hi + NR Significant improvement in leg pain Good

NR = Not recorded by authors

*h = heterogeneous, Hi = hyperintense, Lo = hypointense

†According to Macnab score23)