Table 2.
Independent variable | Broad consent (n=1528)% Finding this model acceptable | Narrow consent (n=1533)% Finding this model acceptable | Odds Ratio | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 76 | 74 | 1.5 | 0.14 |
Race and ethnic group | ||||
White non-Hispanics | 81 | 77 | 1.29 | 0.07 |
Black non-Hispanics | 69 | 72 | 0.86 | 0.42 |
Hispanics | 71 | 67 | 1.19 | 0.36 |
2+ Races | 72 | 67 | 1.53 | 0.39 |
Gender | ||||
Male | 74 | 71 | 1.22 | 0.13 |
Female | 77 | 76 | 1.08 | 0.56 |
Education | ||||
<Bachelor's degree | 73 | 70 | 1.18 | 0.12 |
Bachelor's degree+ | 83 | 82 | 1.02 | 0.91 |
Income | ||||
≤$25,000 | 71 | 70 | 0.89 | 0.54 |
$26,000–$50,000 | 73 | 70 | 1.32 | 0.12 |
$51,000–$85,000 | 77 | 74 | 1.26 | 0.23 |
≥$86,000 | 82 | 79 | 1.21 | 0.34 |
Insurance | ||||
No insurance coverage | 66 | 59 | 1.25 | 0.24 |
Insurance coverage | 78 | 77 | 1.21 | 0.34 |
Blood donation in past 5 years | ||||
No | 73 | 72 | 1.10 | 0.33 |
Yes | 84 | 80 | 1.41 | 0.14 |
We controlled for age as a continuous variable in all p value calculations. Within Hispanics, chosen survey language was not a significant predictor of broador narrow consent.