Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 18;10(9):e0138478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138478

Table 3. Association between individual SNP and colorectal cancer risk.

Genotype Controls (%) Cases (%) P a OR (95%CI) b P b
rs2193941
AA 310(44.4) 277(41.3) 0.516 1.000
AG 305(43.7) 310(46.3) 1.142 (0.909–1.434) 0.253
GG 83(11.9) 83(12.4) 1.102 (0.779–1.560) 0.583
Dominant model 1.131(0.912–1.403) 0.263
Recessive model 1.040(0.750–1.442) 0.813
Additive model 1.078(0.921–1.263) 0.350
rs17716310
AA 337(48.4) 294(43.1) 0.117 1.000
AC 284(40.7) 314(46.0) 1.273 (1.016–1.595) 0.036
CC 76(10.9) 74(10.9) 1.104 (0.771–1.581) 0.589
Dominant model 1.238(1.000–1.532) 0.050
Recessive model 0.987(0.702–1.388) 0.939
Additive model 1.123(0.958–1.318) 0.153
rs7703385
CC 324(47.2) 294(43.2) 0.310 1.000
CG 290(42.3) 313(45.9) 1.194 (0.952–1.497) 0.125
GG 72(10.5) 74(10.9) 1.117 (0.776–1.606) 0.553
Dominant model 1.176(0.949–1.458) 0.138
Recessive model 1.031(0.730–1.457) 0.862
Additive model 1.103(0.939–1.296) 0.232

Abbreviations: OR, Odds ratio; 95%CI, 95% confidence interval.

a P values were calculated by the Pearson Chi-Square test

b Data were calculated by logistic regression model after adjusting for sex, age group and smoking status.

The nominal significant and marginal results were in bold.