Table 1.
FDR, sensitivity, experiment-wise error rate (EWER), and type I error values by inference procedure. The BFDR use a δ intensity change of 0.05. To determine assessment values for SimBaS, a cutoff of α = 0.05 was used. Likewise, the PWCI used 95% point-wise credible intervals to determine significant locations.
| Measure | Surface | BFDR | SimBaS | PWCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDR0.01 | Lagged | 0.06% | 0.08% | 5.80% |
| Peak | 0.48% | 0.75% | 22.9% | |
| Ridge | 0.12% | 0.19% | 20.5% | |
| Immediate | 2.25% | 2.80% | 20.9% | |
| Ridge + Peak | 0.20% | 0.35% | 17.4% | |
| FDR0.05 | Lagged | 5.74% | 13.9% | 44.7% |
| Peak | 4.01% | 20.4% | 73.5% | |
| Ridge | 9.75% | 15.6% | 53.3% | |
| Immediate | 5.74% | 7.58% | 38.1% | |
| Ridge + Peak | 5.45% | 22.7% | 73.4% | |
| SEN0.05 | Lagged | 98.1% | 96.2% | 99.9% |
| Peak | 64.9% | 73.4% | 99.9% | |
| Ridge | 96.8% | 93.4% | 99.9% | |
| Immediate | 97.9% | 93.8% | 99.9% | |
| Ridge + Peak | 63.6% | 76.3% | 99.9% | |
| SEN0.075 | Lagged | 99.9% | 99.3% | 100% |
| Peak | 94.4% | 88.2% | 99.9% | |
| Ridge | 99.8% | 97.6% | 99.9% | |
| Immediate | 99.9% | 96.2% | 99.9% | |
| Ridge + Peak | 95.7% | 93.3% | 99.9% | |
| EWER0.01 | Lagged | 7.00% | 16.5% | 100% |
| Peak | 4.50% | 10.5% | 100% | |
| Ridge | 9.50% | 49.0% | 100% | |
| Immediate | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Ridge + Peak | 6.00% | 29.0% | 100% | |
| Type I Error | Null | 4.00% | 5.00% | 64.5% |