Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Mar 18;22(13):4392–4401. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4499-y

TABLE 2.

Comparison of hazard ratios by proposed N stage in all cases

N stage HRa (95 % CI) HRa (95 % CI) p valuec HRb (95 % CI) HRb (95 % CI) p valuec
N0 1.0 0.5 (0.3–0.7) <0.0001 1.0 0.6 (0.4–0.9) 0.018
N1 2.1 (1.4–3.0) 1.0 1.6 (1.1–2.4) 1.0
N2 3.0 (1.9–4.6) 1.4 (0.9–2.2) 1.9 (1.1–3.2) 1.2 (0.7–2.0)

CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio

a

HR based on Cox proportional hazard model only, including N stage

b

HR based on Cox proportional hazard model adjusting for age, sex, invasion size, T stage, surgical margin, site specific lassification

c

p value based on Chi square test (Wald test)