. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Comp Neurol. 2015 Jun 10;523(16):2426–2456. doi: 10.1002/cne.23797

Table 2. Validations of Statistics in Figure 2 ^*.

Panel A (ipsilateral)
	Significant effects
	region		F _{(2, 6)} = 9.14, p < 0.05
	level		F _{(29, 174)} = 53.97, p < 0.0001
	region × level		F _{(58, 174)} = 11.15, p < 0.0001
	Post hoc tests:
	Level	VTA vs. LHb	VTA vs. RMTg	RMTg vs. LHb
	3	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 3.08
	4	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 4.97	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 3.79
	5	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 5.50	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 4.24
	6	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 7.07	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 5.38
	7	t ₍₁₈₀₎ =6.56	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 5.18
	8	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 6.71	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 5.79
	9	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 5.15	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 4.79
	10		t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 4.87	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 3.39
	11	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 3.97	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 3.49	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 7.46
	12	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 3.09		t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 4.43
	13			t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 2.84
	14		t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 3.18	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 4.67
	15	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 3.07		t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 4.22
	18	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 2.81		t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 3.87
	19	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 3.72		t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 4.35
	20	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 6.53		t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 5.15
	21	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 5.18		t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 5.56
	22	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 4.70		t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 6.55
	23	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 2.71		t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 2.90
	25		t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 2.59	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 2.90
	26		t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 2.47	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 2.80
Panel B (contralateral):
	Significant effects
	region		F _{(2, 6)} = 17.54, p < 0.01
	level		F _{(29, 174)} = 59.19, p < 0.0001
	region × level		F _{(58, 174)} = 19.42, p < 0.0001
	Post hoc tests:
	Level	VTA vs. LHb	VTA vs. RMTg	RMTg vs. LHb
	11	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 3.59		t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 4.41
	13	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 3.00		t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 4.77
	14	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 2.61	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 4.26	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 6.86
	15	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 2.14	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 3.32	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 5.45
	18	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 2.64	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 5.04	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 7.68
	19	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 7.03	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 7.95	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 14.97
	20	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 10.83	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 5.29	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 16.12
	21	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 8.36	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 4.19	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 12.55
	22	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 6.20	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 2.305	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 8.50
	23	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 7.77		t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 7.03
	24	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 6.61	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 3.37	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 3.24
	25			t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 3.14
	26:		t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 5.33	t ₍₁₈₀₎ = 6.98

t values are given only for the levels that are significant. p values are given in the graph (Fig. 2).

Table 2. Validations of Statistics in Figure 2*.

Table 2. Validations of Statistics in Figure 2 ^*.