Table 2.
Locomotion performance | Interlimb coordination | Motivation | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mouse line | No. of steps | No. of missteps | Regular steps (%) | No. of blocks | Block size | Effc. trials (%) | Step time (ms) | CV2 | ||||||
SL 2 | SL 4 | SL 2 | SL 4 | SL 2 | SL 4 | Front–hind | Left–right | |||||||
Pcd | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | n | ↓ | ↓ | n | ↑ | ↑ | imp. | imp. | n |
L7-Pp2b | ↑ | n | ↑ | ↓ | n | n | ↓ | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ | n | imp. | imp. | n |
L7-∆y2 | ↑ | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | ↑ | n | imp. | imp. | n |
α6-Cacna1a | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | imp. | imp. | n |
During the non-perturbed sessions locomotion performance was severely impaired in Pcd and L7-Pp2 mice, but only slightly altered in L7-Δγ2 and α6-Cacna1a mice. At the same time, all four cerebellar mutant mouse lines exhibited poor interlimb coordination. None of the cerebellar mouse lines displayed deficits in motivation. Significant increases (↑) and decreases (↓) relative to control littermates are indicated; n indicates no significant difference found with repeated measures ANOVA
SL 2 step length = 2, SL 4 step length = 4, Effc. trials efficient trials, imp. impaired