Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Contraception. 2015 Jun 17;92(4):313–318. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.012

Table 2.

Screening test characteristics for three screening strategies for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae at the time of IUD insertion

Variables Sensitivity % (95%CI) [# true positive/total # infected] Specificity % (95%CI) [# true negative/total # uninfected] NPV % (95%CI) [# true negative/# screen negative] PPV % (95%CI) [# true positive/# screen positive] Negative LR Number of missed infections n (%)
Age-based (age ≤25) 80.7 (73.2, 86.4) [121/150] 48.1 (46.6, 49.5) [2372/4937] 98.8 (98.3, 99.2) [2372/2401] 4.5 (3.8, 5.4) [121/2686] 0.4 29 (19.3)
Age/Partner-based (age ≤25 and multiple sexual partners) 84.7 (77.7, 89.8) [127/150] 44.8 (43.4, 46.2) [2211/4937] 99.0 (98.5, 99.3) [2211/2234] 4.5 (3.7, 5.3) [127/2853] 0.3 23 (15.3)
Risk-based (age ≤25, multiple sexual partners, history of prior STI, and inconsistent condom use) 99.3 (99.5, 100) [149/150] 7.6 (6.8, 8.3) [375/4937] 99.7 (98.5, 99.9) [375/376] 3.2 (2.7, 3.7) [149/4711] 0.1 1 (0.7)

NPV – negative predictive value; PPV – positive predictive value; LR – likelihood ratio; STI – sexually transmitted infection