TABLE 4.
Drug combination | Class | Net effect | Synergy scorea | Antagonism scorea |
---|---|---|---|---|
TAF + TFV | NRTI | Additive | 24 | −14 |
TAF + FTC | NRTI | Strong synergy | 131 | −9 |
TAF + EFV | NNRTI | Moderate synergy | 100 | −7 |
TAF + NVP | NNRTI | Slight synergy | 41 | −14 |
TAF + EVG | INSTI | Strong synergy | 271 | −9 |
TAF + RAL | INSTI | Strong synergy | 205 | −10 |
TAF + DTG | INSTI | Strong synergy | 179 | −10 |
TAF + ATV | PI | Moderate synergy | 96 | −10 |
TAF + DRV | PI | Moderate synergy | 56 | −12 |
TAF + COBI | PK enhancer | Additive | 17 | −22 |
TAF + TAF | Control | Additive | 20 | −17 |
ddI + RBV | Control | Strong synergy | 302 | −20 |
d4T+ RBV | Control | Strong antagonism | 20 | −340 |
The data shown represent the means of the results of >3 independent experiments performed in triplicate.