Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct;142:118–127. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.026

Table 3.

Direct and indirect (via intention) effects of the secondary outcome variables on FOBT uptake.

Direct effect Indirect effects
Point estimate Product of coefficients
95% CI
SE Z Lower Upper
HLOC and AR groups (n = 13,645)
ICK −0.37 −0.07 0.01 −13.27 −0.09 −0.06
Perceived benefit 0.01 0.26 0.02 18.97 0.23 0.29
HLOC Internal −0.10 0.01 0.00 3.22 0.005 0.02
HLOC Chance −0.02 0.00 0.00 −0.42 −0.01 0.01
HLOC Others −0.07 −0.02 0.01 −3.37 −0.03 −0.01



AR group only (n = 6692)
AR 0.15 0.23 0.02 10.91 0.19 0.28
ICK −0.31 −0.04 0.01 −6.85 −0.06 −0.03
PB −0.06 0.14 0.02 10.28 0.11 0.18
HLOC Internal 0.09 0.00 0.01 0.22 −0.01 0.01
HLOC Chance −0.02 −0.01 0.01 −1.02 −0.02 0.01
HLOC Others −0.09 −0.02 0.01 −3.68 −0.03 −0.01

Note: Based on 5000 bootstrapping samples; 95% CI = lower and upper level of the bias-corrected confidence intervals for α = 0.05: intervals are significant if they do not contain zero (Preacher and Hayes, 2004). Direct effects (including 95% CIs) are also shown in Fig. 2. FOBT = faecal occult blood test; AR = anticipated regret; ICK = perceived disgust; HLOC = Health Locus of Control.