Table 2. School Food and Drink Environment by Type of School and Type of Staff Member Responding to Questionnairea, Victoria, Australia, 2013ā2014.
| Type of Administrator/Question | Combined Primary and Secondary Schools (n = 6) | Primary School (n = 9) | Secondary School (n = 31) |
|---|---|---|---|
| School principals | |||
| No. of principal responses | 2 | 7 | 11 |
| Proximity of nearest milk barb/fast food outlet (4-point scale from 1 [⤠100 m] to 4 [>1 km]), mean | 3.0 | 2.4 | 2.7 |
| Food service operating at the school in the last 12 months, % yes | 100 | 86 | 91 |
| Food service operated by external food company, % yes | 0 | 33 | 64 |
| Food service an important source of school funds, % yes | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| Food service exclusive contract with soft drink/other foods, % yes | 0 | 0 | 25 |
| Written food policy promoting nutrition and healthy eating, % yes | 0 | 71 | 40 |
| Students allowed to drink water in the classroom during class-time, % yes | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| School has a school vegetable garden, % yes | 50 | 86 | 70 |
| School teachersc | |||
| No. of schools represented by teacher responses | 6 | 8 | 19 |
| No. of teacher responses | 11 | 16 | 39 |
| Existence of written school nutrition or healthy canteen policy (0 = no; 1 = yes), mean | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| School canteen provides foods high in nutritional value (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree), mean | 2.5 | 3.5 | 2.8 |
| Proportion of teachers are aware of nutrition or healthy canteen policy (1 = very few to 5 = all), mean | 2.4 | 4.1 | 2.5 |
| Proportion of parents aware of nutrition or healthy canteen policy (1 = very few to 5 = all), mean | 1.9 | 3.3 | 2.4 |
| Nutrition or healthy canteen policy compliance in last 12 months (1 = very poor to 5 = very good), mean | 2.8 | 4.4 | 3.6 |
| Parental support for healthy eating in last 12 months (1 = very low to 5 = very high), mean | 3.0 | 2.9 | 2.7 |
| Proportion of teachers as good healthy eating role models (1 = very few to 5 = all), mean | 4.5 | 4.3 | 3.5 |
| Effectiveness of promoting healthy eating among students (1 = not effective to 4 = very effective), mean | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.7 |
| Canteen managersd | |||
| No. of canteen manager responses | 2 | 2 | 9 |
| No. of days per week school food service operated, mean | 4.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| School food service open to students at recess, % yes | 100 | 50 | 100 |
| School food service open to students at lunch time, % yes | 50 | 100 | 100 |
| Fruit usually available from school food service, % yes | 50 | 100 | 100 |
| Vegetables/salad usually available from school food service, % yes | 100 | 50 | 100 |
| Lollies/confectionary/chocolate usually available from school food service, % yes | 0 | 0 | 33 |
| Pies/sausage rolls/hot chips usually available from school food service, % yes | 50 | 50 | 100 |
| Crisps/chips usually available from school food service, % yes | 50 | 0 | 89 |
| Sugar-sweetened drinks usually available from school food service, % yes | 50 | 0 | 56 |
| Pricing policy to encourage sale of healthy foods at reduced cost, % yes | 100 | 50 | 56 |
| Food service routinely promotes healthy food choices, % yes | 100 | 50 | 100 |
School staff members (school principal, canteen manager, and 3 teachers at each school) were invited to participate in a survey on the school food environment.
Small truck stop, corner store, or convenience store.
Teacher responses per school were averaged to 1 score per variable for each school.
Thirty-nine schools had canteen or food services: 6 Pā12 schools, 4 primary schools, and 29 secondary schools.