Table 3.
EPHPP - Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies
Study | (A) Selection Bias |
(B) Study Design |
(C) Confounder |
(D) Blinding |
(E) Data Collection Method |
(F) With drawals and Drop-outs |
GLOBAL RATING |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bauminger, 2002 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Bauminger, 2007a (group) | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Bauminger, 2007b | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Begeer, et al, 2011 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
XDeLuca, 2004 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Dyck & Denver, 2003 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Fox et al, 2012 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Grazzani & Ornaghi, 2011 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Hadwin, Baron-Cohen, Holwin & Hill, 1996 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
Ornaghi, Brockmeier & Grazzani, 2011 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Peng et al, 1992 Study 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
Peng et al, 1992 Study 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Pons et al, 2002 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Schonert-Reichl et al, 2012 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
XSmith, 2010 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Solomon et al, 2004 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Steerneman and Huskens, 1996 Study 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
Steerneman and Huskens, 1996 Study 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
Tenenbaum et al, 2008 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Note.
Dissertation
1 = Strong, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Weak