Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Rev. 2015 Sep 1;37:41–65. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2015.05.001

Table 3.

EPHPP - Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies

Study (A)
Selection
Bias
(B)
Study
Design
(C)
Confounder
(D)
Blinding
(E)
Data
Collection
Method
(F)
With
drawals
and
Drop-outs
GLOBAL
RATING
Bauminger, 2002 2 2 3 2 2 1 2
Bauminger, 2007a (group) 2 2 3 2 2 1 2
Bauminger, 2007b 2 2 3 2 2 1 2
Begeer, et al, 2011 1 1 1 2 1 1 1
XDeLuca, 2004 2 1 3 2 3 3 3
Dyck & Denver, 2003 2 2 3 2 1 1 2
Fox et al, 2012 1 2 3 2 1 1 2
Grazzani & Ornaghi, 2011 2 1 1 2 1 1 1
Hadwin, Baron-Cohen, Holwin & Hill, 1996 2 1 3 2 3 1 3
Ornaghi, Brockmeier & Grazzani, 2011 2 1 1 2 1 1 1
Peng et al, 1992 Study 1 2 1 3 2 3 1 3
Peng et al, 1992 Study 2 2 1 3 2 2 1 2
Pons et al, 2002 2 1 3 2 1 1 2
Schonert-Reichl et al, 2012 1 1 1 2 2 1 1
XSmith, 2010 2 1 1 2 1 1 1
Solomon et al, 2004 2 1 1 2 2 1 1
Steerneman and Huskens, 1996 Study 1 2 1 3 2 3 1 3
Steerneman and Huskens, 1996 Study 2 2 2 3 2 3 1 3
Tenenbaum et al, 2008 2 1 1 2 1 1 1

Note.

X

Dissertation

1 = Strong, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Weak