. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 21.

Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychobiol. 2010 Jul;52(5):487–503. doi: 10.1002/dev.20451

Table 2.

Experiment 1—Food Retrieval Behavior in the Presence of Animal-Like Objects

Frequency(rate)
		Lesion Group
		C	A	H	Effect of Object Complexity
Object Type	No Object	.74 ± .17	.89 ± .05	.86 ± .07	F(2, 42)=11.63, p<.0001, η_p²=.356
	Simple Object	.59 ± .18	.72 ± .14	.75 ± .14
	Complex Object	.53 ± .16	.56 ± .13	.75 ±. 16
					Lesion X Object Complexity
	Effect of Lesion	F(2, 21)=.42, p<.66, η_p²=.038			F(4, 42)=1.04, p<.40, η_p²=.090
	Effect of Lesion	A v. C, n.s.; H v. C, n.s; A v. H, n.s.			F(4, 42)=1.04, p<.40, η_p²=.090

Latency (seconds)
		Lesion Group
		C	A	H	Effect of Object Complexity
Object Type	No Object	19.15 ± 4.48	6.99 ± 2.26	10.15 ± 2.54	F(2, 42)=23.96, p<.0001, η_p²=.533
	Simple Object	13.69 ± 5.01	12.02 ± 3.64	13.69 ± 3.92
	Complex Object	15.86 ± 4.29	15.95 ± 3.25	15.86 ± 3.41
					Lesion X Object Complexity
	Effect of Lesion	F(2, 21)=.20, p<.82, η_p²=.019			F(4, 42)=.39, p<.82, η_p²=.036
	Effect of Lesion	A v. C, n.s.; H v. C, n.s; A v. H, n.s.			F(4, 42)=.39, p<.82, η_p²=.036

Note: C: control group; A: amygdala-lesioned group; H: hippocampus-lesioned group. Means ± standard errors. Lesion groups were compared using Mann-Whitney tests.