. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 21.

Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychobiol. 2010 Jul;52(5):487–503. doi: 10.1002/dev.20451

Table 3.

Experiment 1— Exploration of Animal-Like Objects

Frequency (rate) ^†
		Lesion Group
		C	A	H	Effect of Object Complexity
Trial Type	Simple Object	0 ± 0	.16 ± .09	.13 ± .07	F(1, 21)=.00003, p<.99, η_p²=.000
Trial Type	Complex Object	0 ± 0	.32 ± .15	0 ± 0	F(1, 21)=.00003, p<.99, η_p²=.000
					Lesion X Object Complexity
	Effect of Lesion	F(2, 21)=3.32, p<.06, η_p²=.240			F(2, 21)=4.21, p<.03, η_p²=.286
	Effect of Lesion	A>C, p<.011; H>C, p<.064; A v. H, n.s.			F(2, 21)=4.21, p<.03, η_p²=.286

Duration (seconds) ^†
		Lesion Group
		C	A	H	Effect of Object Complexity
Object Type	Simple Object	0 ± 0	1.23 ± .73	.27 ± .17	F(1, 21)=.082, p<.78, η_p²=.004
Object Type	Complex Object	0 ± 0	1.39 ± .67	0 ± 0	F(1, 21)=.082, p<.78, η_p²=.004
					Lesion X Object Complexity
	Effect of Lesion	F(2, 21)=5.58, p<.01, η_p²=.347			F(2, 21)=.43, p<.65, η_p²=.040
	Effect of Lesion	A>C, p<.011; H>C, p<.064; A v. H, n.s.			F(2, 21)=.43, p<.65, η_p²=.040

Latency(seconds)
		Lesion Group
		C	A	H	Effect of Object Complexity
Object Type	Simple Object	30 ± 0	27.36 ± 1.48	28.69 ± .85	F(1, 21)=.27, p<.61, η_p²=.013
Object Type	Complex Object	30 ± 0	25.13 ± 2.21	30 ± 0	F(1, 21)=.27, p<.61, η_p²=.013
					Lesion X Object Complexity
	Effect of Lesion	F(2, 21)=3.78, p<.04, η_p²=.26			F(2, 21)=3.11, p<.07, η_p²=.229
	Effect of Lesion	A>C, p<.011; H>C, p<.064; A v .H, n.s.			F(2, 21)=3.11, p<.07, η_p²=.229

Note: C: control group; A: amygdala-lesioned group; H: hippocampus-lesioned group. Means ± standard errors. Lesion groups were compared using Mann-Whitney tests.

^†

data used in ANOVA was log transformed.