Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 21.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychobiol. 2010 Jul;52(5):487–503. doi: 10.1002/dev.20451

Table 6.

Experiment 2— Exploration of Animal-Like Objects

Frequency (rate)
Lesion Group
C A H Effect of Object Complexity
Trial Type Simple Object .06 ± .06 .54 ± .22 .22 ± .12 F(1, 20)=.96, p<.34, ηp2=.046
Complex Object .03 ± .03 .61 ± .40 .41 ± .16
Lesion X Object Complexity
Effect of Lesion F(2, 20)=2.09, p<.15, ηp2=.173 F(2, 20)=.70, p<.51, ηp2=.065
A>C, p<.060; H>C, p<.050; A v. H, n.s.
Duration (seconds)
Lesion Group
C A H Effect of Object Complexity
Trial Type Simple Object .06 ± .06 2.06 ± .87 .33 ± .19 F(1, 20)=.19, p<.67, ηp2=.009
Complex Object .03 ± .03 2.84 ± 1.75 .72 ± .33
Lesion X Object Complexity
Effect of Lesion F(2, 20)=3.24, p<.06, ηp2=.245 F(2, 20)=1.27, p<.30, ηp2=.113
A>C, p<.046; H>C, p<.035; A v. H, n.s.
Latency(seconds)
Lesion Group
C A H Effect of Object Complexity
Trial Type Simple Object 29.43 ± .57 20.28 ± 4.19 27.86 ± 1.25 F(1, 20)=.37, p<.55, ηp2=.018
Complex Object 29.58 ± .42 22.49 ± 4.16 25.78 ± 2.07
Lesion X Object Complexity
Effect of Lesion F(1, 21)=2.19, p<.14, ηp2=.180 F(2, 20)=1.65, p<.22, ηp2=.142
A<C, p<.063; H<C, p<.061; A v .H, n.s.

Note: C: control group; A: amygdala-lesioned group; H: hippocampus-lesioned group. Means ± standard errors. Lesion groups were compared using Mann-Whitney tests.

data used in ANOVA was log transformed.