. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 21.

Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychobiol. 2010 Jul;52(5):487–503. doi: 10.1002/dev.20451

Table 7.

Experiment 2—Food Retrieval Behavior in the Presence of Stationary-Mobile Objects

Frequency(rate)
		Lesion Group
		C	A	H	Effect of Object Complexity
Trial Type	No Object	.97 ± .02	1 ± 0	.94 ± .06	F(2, 40)=17.88, p<.0001, η_p²=.472
	Stationary Object	.75 ± .11	.93 ± .05	.91 ± .07
	Mobile Object	.41 ± .12	.75 ± .09	.75 ± .09
					Lesion X Object Complexity
	Effect of Lesion	F(2, 20)=2.16, p<.14, η_p²=.178			F(4, 40)=2.48, p<.06, η_p²=.199
	Effect of Lesion	A>C, p<.088; H>C, p<.098; A v. H, n.s.			F(4, 40)=2.48, p<.06, η_p²=.199

Latency (seconds)
		Lesion Group
		C	A	H	Effect of Object Complexity
Trial Type	No Object	4.40 ± 1.25	3.48 ± .51	5.41 ± 2.15	F(2, 40)=33.25, p<.0001, η_p²=.624
	Stationary Object	10.25 ± 3.04	6.22 ± 1.29	7.83 ± 2.35
	Mobile Object	20.92 ± 2.93	13.81 ± 3.18	13.97 ± 1.78
					Lesion X Object Complexity
	Effect of Lesion	F(2, 20)=1.61, p<.22, η_p²=.139			F(4, 40)=1.85, p<.14, η_p²=.156
	Effect of Lesion	A v. C, n.s.; H v. C, n.s; A v. H, n.s.			F(4, 40)=1.85, p<.14, η_p²=.156

Note: C: control group; A: amygdala-lesioned group; H: hippocampus-lesioned group. Means ± standard errors. Lesion groups were compared using Mann-Whitney tests.