. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 21.

Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychobiol. 2010 Jul;52(5):487–503. doi: 10.1002/dev.20451

Table 8.

Experiment 2-- Exploration of Stationary-Mobile Objects

Frequency (rate) ^†
		Lesion Group
		C	A	H	Effect of Object Complexity
Trial Type	Stationary Object	.13 ± .09	.54 ± .23	.16 ± .08	F(1, 20)=11.98, p<.002, η²=.375
Trial Type	Mobile Object	0 ± 0	.25 ± .11	0 ± 0	F(1, 20)=11.98, p<.002, η²=.375
					Lesion X Object Complexity
	Effect of Lesion	F(2, 20)=4.20, p<.030, η²=.296			F(2, 20)=2.94, p<.75, η²=.029
	Effect of Lesion	A>C, p<.050; H v. C, n.s.; A>H, p<.076			F(2, 20)=2.94, p<.75, η²=.029

Duration (seconds) ^†
		Lesion Group
		C	A	H	Effect of Object Complexity
Trial Type	Stationary Object	.06 ± .06	2.06 ± .87	.33 ± .19	F(1, 20)=10.94, p<.004, η_p²=.354
Trial Type	Mobile Object	0 ± 0	1.14 ± .56	0 ± 0	F(1, 20)=10.94, p<.004, η_p²=.354
					Lesion X Object Complexity
	Effect of Lesion	F(2, 20)=4.74, p<.021, η_p²=.322			F(2, 20)=.81, p<.460, η_p²=.075
	Effect of Lesion	A>C, p<.045; H v. C, n.s.; A>H, p<.088			F(2, 20)=.81, p<.460, η_p²=.075

Latency(seconds) ^†
		Lesion Group
		C	A	H	Effect of Object Complexity
Trial Type	Stationary Object	27.96 ± 1.47	23.39 ± 3.12	28.20 ± .94	F(1, 20)=4.78, p<.04, η_p²=.193
Trial Type	Mobile Object	30 ± 0	25.63 ± 1.80	30 ± 0	F(1, 20)=4.78, p<.04, η_p²=.193
					Lesion X Object Complexity
	Effect of Lesion	F(2, 20)=2.73, p<.09, η_p²=.214			F(2, 20)=3.91, p<.68, η_p²=.038
	Effect of Lesion	A<C, p<.060; H v. C, n.s.; A<H, p<.067			F(2, 20)=3.91, p<.68, η_p²=.038

Note: C: control group; A: amygdala-lesioned group; H: hippocampus-lesioned group. Means ± standard errors. Lesion groups were compared using Mann-Whitney tests.

^†

data used in ANOVA was log transformed.