Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 24;112(37):11565–11570. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1515366112

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Structural ensemble of the EIA–PEP complex obtained from combined refinement against SAXS and RDC data for Ne = 2. (A) Overall distribution of EIN relative to EIC displayed as a reweighted atomic probability density map plotted at 2% (transparent yellow surface) of maximum. EIC is shown as a white ribbon. Conformations adopted by EIN in the EIclosed and EIpartially closed states are shown as blue and green ribbons, respectively. (B) Backbone atomic probability density map (plotted at 50% and 2% of maximum in transparent red and yellow, respectively) for EIpartially closed generated from the Ne = 2 calculations. (C) Orientation of EINα relative to EINα/β (white ribbon). EINα in EIopen, EIclosed, and EIpartially closed is displayed in red (transparent), dark blue/light blue (for the two subunits of the X-ray structure of EIclosed), and green, respectively. The Cα rms difference between EINα of EIpartially closed (green) and EIclosed (dark blue) is smaller than the Cα rms difference between the dark-blue and light-blue EINα subdomains of EIclosed: 3.2 Å vs. 5.6 Å (Table S1).