Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Jul 26;26(10):911–921. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.07.004

Table 4.

Comparison of pooled random-effects FPRs and time-to-CC by quality rating and recruitment from a liver speciality clinic.

Factor Stage constant
Stage-specific
F0→F4
F0→F1
F1→F2
F2→F3
F3→F4
N reports Estimate 95% CI Years to CC N reports Estimate 95% CI Estimate 95% CI Estimate 95% CI Estimate 95% CI Years to CC
Quality rating
  Low 3 0.164 0.136 – 0.191 24 1 0.139 0.67 – 0.210 0.160 0.032 – 0.287 0.322 −0.066–- 0.710 0.070 −0.105 – 0.246 34
  Moderate 0 0
  High 7 0.107 0.089 – 0.126 37 5 0.126 0.073 – 0.180 0.055 0.032 – 0.078 0.078 0.060 – 0.095 0.118 0.057 – 0.178 44
Recruited exclusively
from a liver specialty clinic
  Yes 5 0.112 0.090 – 0.135 36 4 0.143 0.129 – 0.157 0.064 0.043 – 0.086 0.083 0.064 – 0.103 0.133 0.094 – 0.172 42
  No 5 0.125 0.089 – 0.162 32 2 0.081 0.011 – 0.151 0.046 −0.009 – 0.101 0.052 0.010 – 0.093 0.065 −0.015 – 0.144 69