Table 1.

Experimental obtained data by different models about the antioxidant characteristics of the studied monomers and dimers.

experimental model	model 1 CLa	model 2 lipidAOb		model 3 ORACc
kinetic parameters	kAd [M−1s−1]	PFe [—]	IDf [—]	RTEg [—]
2	(1.7 ± 0.1) × 104	3.5h,i	6.3h,i	3.12 ± 0.34
6	(4.2 ± 0.3) × 104	13.5h,i	29.3h,i	3.04 ± 0.10
3	(2.6 ± 0.2) × 104	3.5h	5.5h	3.85 ± 0.14
7	(5.1 ± 0.3) × 104	5.8h	8.8h	2.97 ± 0.12
4	(2.6 ± 0.2) × 104	5.8	9.8	5.60 ± 0.20
8	(3.4 ± 0.2) × 104	12.8	11.0	5.22 ± 0.13
5	(1.6 ± 0.1) × 104	3.2h	4.4h	2.56 ± 0.10
9	(4.1 ± 0.3) × 104	3.3h	4.2h	1.98 ± 0.06
11	(1.0 ± 0.1) × 106	21.2i	29.3i	—

^aChlorobenzene as medium, ethylbenzene as oxidizing substrate, AIBN (2,2′-azobisisobutyronitrile) as initiator at 50 °C; ^btriacylglycerols of sunflower oil as oxidizing substrate, without an initiator, at 80 °C; ^cwater as medium, fluorescein (13) as substrate, AAPH (2,2'-azobisisobutyramidinium chloride) as initiator at 37 °C; ^drate constant k_A value acquired from the slope of the CL time profile at the inflection point according to (dI_rel/dt)_max = 0.237(k_A/(2k_t)^0.5)R_IN; ^eantioxidant efficiency, determined as protection factor (PF = IP_A/IP_C), where IP_A and IP_C are the induction periods in the presence and in the absence of an antioxidant; ^fantioxidant reactivity as inhibition degree (ID = R_C/R_A), where R_C and R_A are the initial rates of lipid autoxidation in the absence and in the presence of the antioxidant; ^grelative Trolox equivalent (RTE) was calculated according to the following equation (AUC: area under curve) [(AUC_Sample − AUC_Blank)/(AUC_Trolox − AUC_Blank)] × (molarity of Trolox/molarity of sample); ^hfrom [19]; ⁱfrom [20].