Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 25;11:1486–1493. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.11.161

Table 1.

Optimization of the tandem CEYM–IMDAR.

graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-11-1486-i001.jpg

entry solvent T (°C) 1a:2a t (h) additive % yield 3aa

1 toluene 90 1:3 6 25
2 toluene 90 1:3 24 37
3 toluene 90 1:3 48 57
4 toluene 90 1:3 72 39
5 toluene 90 1:1 48 36
6 toluene 90 1:5 48 30
7 toluene 110 1:3 48 52
8 toluene 140 1:3 48 37
9 DCM 60 1:3 48 25
10 C6H5CF3 90 1:3 48 60
11 toluene 90 1:3 48 Ti(OiPr)4b 38
12 toluene 90 1:3 48 BF3·OEt2b 15
13 toluene 90 1:3 48 thioureac 49
14 toluene 90 1:3 48 BQb,d 37

aIsolated yield after column chromatography. Variable amounts of 4a were observed in all cases, but never exceeded 15% (based on 2a). Some unreacted 2a was also detected in all cases; b5 mol %; c1 mol %; dbenzoquinone.