Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Endod. 2015 Apr 21;41(8):1226–1233. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.03.010

TABLE 2.

Abundance of phyla identified in the entire sample, and by endodontic infection type.

Entire sample Primary Infections Persistent Infections P
Phyla abundance detected abundance detected abundance detected A1 D2
Bacteroidetes 0.362 1.00 0.354 1.00 0.371 1.00 0.8 1.0
Firmicutes 0.329 1.00 0.356 1.00 0.302 1.00 0.4 1.0
Actinobacteria 0.081 0.98 0.086 1.00 0.076 0.96 0.7 1.0
Synergistetes 0.074 0.81 0.110 0.92 0.037 0.71 0.4 0.1
Fusobacteria 0.074 0.88 0.037 0.83 0.111 0.92 0.09 0.7
Proteobacteria 0.052 0.88 0.040 0.79 0.064 0.96 0.02 0.2
Spirochaetes 0.019 0.83 0.012 0.83 0.025 0.83 0.1 1.0
Tenericutes 0.005 0.27 <0.0005 0.12 0.010 0.42 0.03 0.05
TM7 0.001 0.27 0.001 0.17 0.001 0.38 0.2 0.2
Chloroflexi <0.0005 0.19 <0.0005 0.08 0.001 0.29 0.07 0.1
SR1 <0.0005 0.08 <0.0005 0.08 <0.0005 0.08 0.9 1.0
other 0.002 0.94 0.002 0.96 0.002 0.92 0.9 1.0
1

Comparison of abundance between primary and persistent infections, derived from Wilcoxon rank-sum tests

2

Comparison of number of samples where phylum was identified, derived from Fisher’s Exact tests