Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 12;10(4):2176–2184. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3600

Table II.

Comparison of Sanger sequencing, HRM and NGS methods used for mutation detection.

Detection method

Parameters Sanger sequencing HRM NGS
Limit of detection, %a 12.50 5.0–7.50 2.0–5.0
Specificity, % (true negative) 100 (1239/1239) 100 (1239/1239) 100 (30/30)
Missed mutations, n (%) 3/233 (1.29) 0/233 (0.00) 0/30 (0.00)
Total samples tested, n 1472 1472 60
a

Frequency of mutated alleles detected in a background of wild type alleles. HRM, High-resolution melting curve; NGS, next-generation sequencing.