Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 19;62(1):55–66. doi: 10.1007/s10722-014-0135-0

Table 3.

Morphological traits of T. timococcum Kost., nom. nud. grown in the phytotron compared to its parents and to its previous generation (2012 and 2013, Martonvásár)

Plant material assessed Year Number of plants/spikes evaluated Plant height (cm) Tillering (spikes/plant) Length of spike (cm) Florets/spike Seeds/spike Density of spikelets (spikelets/cm of spike)
Triticum timopheevii Zhuk. subsp. timopheevii var. rubiginosum MVGB845 2012 3/14 114.5 5.7 4.69 38.6 25.1 4.13
Triticum monococcum L. subsp. monococcum 1T-1 2012 4/20 70.6 5.0 6.25 33.4 25.1 5.43
T. timococcum 2012 31/88 119.7##,×× 4.9×× 6.67** 42.0## 10.6**,## 3.16**,##,×
2013 31/67 82.7×× 3.1×× 6.22× 41.7 8.7 3.35×

* Significantly different from MVGB845 in 2012 at the P = 0.05 level

** Significantly different from MVGB845 in 2012 at the P = 0.01 level

#Significantly different from 1T-1 in 2012 at the P = 0.05 level

##Significantly different from 1T-1 in 2012 at the P = 0.01 level

×Significantly different from T. timococcum in the other year at the P = 0.05 level

××Significantly different from T. timococcum in the other year at the P = 0.01 level