Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 28;21(36):10443–10452. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i36.10443

Table 4.

Adverse reactions of patients enrolled in our study n (%)

Adverse reaction Chemoembolization (n = 92)
Chemoembolization + HAIC (n = 137)
I + II III + IV I + II III + IV P1 P2
Hematologic toxicity
Reduction of white cells 13 (14.1) 0 21 (15.3) 2 (1.4) 0.803 -
Reduction of hemoglobin 17 (18.5) 3 (3.3) 21 (15.3) 2 (1.4) 0.530 0.393
Reduction of thrombocyte 19 (20.7) 7 (7.6) 57 (41.6) 5 (3.6) 0.001 0.231
Non-hematologic toxicity
Increase of total bilirubin 38 (41.3) 4 (4.3) 74 (54.0) 5 (3.6) 0.059 0.744
Increase of glutamate pyruvate transaminase 55 (59.8) 5 (5.4) 78 (56.9) 11 (8.0) 0.668 0.450
Increase of glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase 50 (54.3) 8 (8.7) 82 (59.8) 9 (6.5) 0.408 0.547
Fever 55 (59.8) 11 (12.0) 64 (46.7) 12 (8.8) 0.052 0.430
Pain1 40 (43.5) 3 (3.3) 63 (46.0) 19 (13.9) 0.708 0.008
Nausea 47 (51.1) 3 (3.3) 91 (66.4) 5 (3.6) 0.030 0.875
Vomit 19 (20.7) 0 47 (34.3) 3 (2.2) 0.025 -
Diarrhea 1 (1.1) 0 4 (3.0) 0 0.768 -
Constipation 18 (19.6) 1 (1.1) 29 (21.2) 0 0.6513 -
Neurotoxicity2 - - 13 (6.8) 0 - -
1

Pain was evaluated according to the grading standards for acute and subacute toxicity reactions for anti-cancer drugs issued by the WHO;

2

Neurotoxicity was evaluated according to the Levi special grading standard for sensory nerve toxicity;

3

Fisher’s exact testing method, χ2 test (P1 value: comparison of grades I + II adverse reactions between the two groups; P2 value: comparison of grades III + IV adverse reactions between the two groups). Statistics for adverse events: Evaluation based on the NCI - CTCAE v3.0 criteria. P-values: Pearson method, χ2 test.