Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 14;10(4):2107–2117. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3609

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Prognostic analysis was conducted by combining FAS and mHER2 expression status. (A) There were significant differences in the survival outcomes in the two groups (Wilcoxon test; P=0.0096; hazards ratio, 2.647; confidence interval, 1.267–5.532). The group with concordant expression of FAS and HER2 showed a worse outcome. When stratified by different (B) tumor differentiation grade, (C) patient age and (D) lymph node (LN) metastasis, the prognostic significance could still be obtained. FAS, fatty acid synthase; mHER2, membranous human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.