Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014 May 20;13:20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.05.007

Table 4.

Quality metrics generated by MiSeq Reporter for sequencing runs that used both Qubit and q-PCR methods for quantification and sequencing runs using only Qubit quantification after optimization.

Quantification
Method
Sample
Count
Cluster
(K/m2)
Yield
(Gb)
>Q3
(%)
Clusters
(K)
Passing
%
Unaligned
(K)
Unindexed
(K)
Duplicate
(K)
Qubit + q− 12 697 6.0 84.8 11,76 91.2 2,18 242 3,98
12 307 2.9 87.6 5,54 91.5 1,77 147 1,06
11 634 5.8 89.7 11,23 91.6 4,09 180 2,19
11 666 6.2 87.0 11,90 91.9 3,46 222 2,91
11 1107 8.1 80.4 15,73 79.1 4,82 505 4,12
11 991 7.7 81.1 15,03 82.0 5,30 355 3,53
11 1323 10.5 82.8 20,47 83.4 7,21 377 5,58
11 1181 9.7 82.5 18,95 85.7 5,41 376 5,18
12 550 5.0 89.6 9,77 91.8 173 463 3,20
12 863 7.7 88.3 14,89 89.9 336 691 5,72
avg. 854. 7.0 84.5 13633. 87.0 3549. 353. 3454.
stnd. 317. 2.3 3.5 4416. 4.8 2323. 167. 1498.
Qubit 12 992 8.7 86.6 16,90 89.3 421 761 6,51
11 986 8.5 84.9 16,60 88.6 5,73 319 4,44
avg. 989. 8.6 85.8 16754. 89.0 3077. 540. 5482.
stnd. 4.2 0.1 1.2 212. 0.5 3756. 312. 1465.