Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015 Feb;19(2):244–250. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.14.0132

Table 5.

PRs from regression models of severe exacerbation of asthma with several occupational exposure subcategories*

Occupational exposure assessed by the N-JEM PR (95%CI) P value
Model A: all participants
    LMW agent
        Other highly reactive agents 1.65 (0.93–2.91) 0.08
    IRR agents
        Inorganic dusts 2.41 (1.46–3.99) 0.0006
        Metalworking fluids 1.34 (0.65–2.74) 0.43
        Combustion particles 1.24 (0.80–1.91) 0.33
        High probability of exposure to ETS 1.84 (1.34–2.51) 0.0001
Model B: men
    IRR agents
        Inorganic dusts 2.53 (1.37–4.67) 0.003
        Metalworking fluids 1.51 (0.60–3.79) 0.38
        Combustion particles 1.33 (0.63–2.80) 0.45
        High probability of exposure to ETS 3.25 (1.72–6.14) 0.0003
Model C: women
    LMW agent
        Other highly reactive agents 1.97 (1.08–3.60) 0.03
    IRR agents
        Combustion particles 1.16 (0.66–2.04) 0.60
        High probability of exposure to ETS 1.50 (1.04–2.17) 0.03
*

The common reference category for occupational exposures comprised those who had jobs with no exposure to asthma-related agents. Each model also included three potential confounders: sex, the oldest of three age categories (39-44 years), and asthma severity (persistent vs. intermittent).

PR = prevalence ratio; N-JEM = asthma-specific job-exposure matrix; CI = confidence interval; LMW = low molecular weight; IRR = irritant; ETS = environmental tobacco smoke.