Table 5.
PRs from regression models of severe exacerbation of asthma with several occupational exposure subcategories*
Occupational exposure assessed by the N-JEM | PR (95%CI) | P value |
---|---|---|
Model A: all participants | ||
LMW agent | ||
Other highly reactive agents | 1.65 (0.93–2.91) | 0.08 |
IRR agents | ||
Inorganic dusts | 2.41 (1.46–3.99) | 0.0006 |
Metalworking fluids | 1.34 (0.65–2.74) | 0.43 |
Combustion particles | 1.24 (0.80–1.91) | 0.33 |
High probability of exposure to ETS | 1.84 (1.34–2.51) | 0.0001 |
Model B: men | ||
IRR agents | ||
Inorganic dusts | 2.53 (1.37–4.67) | 0.003 |
Metalworking fluids | 1.51 (0.60–3.79) | 0.38 |
Combustion particles | 1.33 (0.63–2.80) | 0.45 |
High probability of exposure to ETS | 3.25 (1.72–6.14) | 0.0003 |
Model C: women | ||
LMW agent | ||
Other highly reactive agents | 1.97 (1.08–3.60) | 0.03 |
IRR agents | ||
Combustion particles | 1.16 (0.66–2.04) | 0.60 |
High probability of exposure to ETS | 1.50 (1.04–2.17) | 0.03 |
The common reference category for occupational exposures comprised those who had jobs with no exposure to asthma-related agents. Each model also included three potential confounders: sex, the oldest of three age categories (39-44 years), and asthma severity (persistent vs. intermittent).
PR = prevalence ratio; N-JEM = asthma-specific job-exposure matrix; CI = confidence interval; LMW = low molecular weight; IRR = irritant; ETS = environmental tobacco smoke.