Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 22;15:230. doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0620-4

Table 4.

QTLs detected for pear architectural and precocity traits for predicted and normalised data

Parent LG Traits Marker with highest LOD Marker position (cM) LOD % Expl.
OH 5 Branches_year1 ss475878191 2.2 6.70 c 10.01
OH 5 Branches_year2 ss475878191 2.2 3.53 c 5.48
OH 5 Inflorescence_year4 ss475878191 2.2 13.06 c 18.31
OH 5 LNG_year4 ss475878191 2.2 11.13 c 16.16
OH 5 Spurs_ year2 ss475878191 2.2 3.51 c 5.44
OH 5 TCAtrunk_year3 ss475878191 2.2 12.37 c 15.99
OH 5 TCAtrunk_ year4 ss475878191 2.2 11.31 c 16.42
OH 5 Branches_ year3 ss527788221 1.6 6.74 c 11.16
OH 5 Height_ year3 ss527789077 0.0 8.57 c 12.69
OH 5 Nodes_ year1 ss527789704 1.1 5.67 c 9.54
OH 5 TCAroot_ year4 ss527789704 1.1 7.89 c 12.45
OH 5 TCAsec_ year3 ss527789704 1.1 10.97 c 16.6
OH 5 TCAtert_ year3 ss527789704 1.1 10.61 c 15.23
OH 5 TCAroot_ year3 ss527789704 1.1 5.55 c 8.97
OH 6 Height_ year3 ss475883025 5.2 4.37 c 16.42
OH 6 Branches_ year1 ss527789305 6.5 5.29 c 7.79
OH 6 Branches_ year2 ss527789305 6.5 5.04 c 7.93
OH 6 Branches_ year3 ss527789305 6.5 4.93 c 7.24
OH 6 Nodes_ year1 ss527789305 6.5 2.95 b 4.72
OH 6 Spurs_ year2 ss527789305 6.5 5.00 c 7.48
OH 6 TCAroot_ year4 ss527789305 6.5 3.21 c 4.81
OH 6 TCAsec_ year3 ss527789305 6.5 4.37 c 6.25
OH 6 TCAtert_ year3 ss527789305 6.5 3.46 c 6.46
OH 6 TCAtrunk_ year1 ss527789305 6.5 5.08 c 7.3
OH 6 TCAtrunk_ year3 ss527789305 6.5 3.46 c 3.98
OH 6 TCAtrunk_ year4 ss527789305 6.5 4.66 c 6.71
OH 6 TCAroots_ year3 ss527789305 6.5 3.51 c 5.28
LBJ 6 Branches_ year1 ss475878560 47.8 2.58 a 4.25
LBJ 6 Spurs_ year2 ss475878560 47.8 2.78 a 4.68
LBJ 6 TCAtrunk_ year4 ss475878560 47.8 3.72 b 6
LBJ 6 Branches_ year3 ss527787860 60.6 2.75 a 5.27
LBJ 6 Height_ year3 ss527787915 59.4 2.77 a 5.65
LBJ 6 TCAsec_ year3 ss527789084 21 4.14 c 6.33
LBJ 6 TCAtert_ year3 ss527789084 21 5.05 c 7.72
LBJ 7 TCAtert_ year3 ss527789229 31.0 3.25 b 4.79
LBJ 16 TCAroot_ year4 ss527788231 56.2 3.02 b 4.2

QTLs were detected coming from ‘Old Home’ (OH) and ‘Louise Bonne de Jersey’ (LBJ). Percentage of the phenotypic variance explained by each QTL (% Expl.) was calculated using ANOVA. See Table 1 for an explanation of the variables. LOD score indicates the genome-wide significance of the QTL a: 90 %, b: 95 % and c: 99 %