Skip to main content
. 2015 May 5;112(12):1921–1928. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.142

Table 2. Univariate analyses for relapse-free survival and overall survival.

    Relapse-free survival
Overall survival
Characteristics N Median (months) HR 95% CI P Median (months) HR 95% CI P
Mutational status
All wt 137 14.4 1 63.3 1
BRAF mut 12 5.7 2.13 1.20–7.31 0.019 22.6 3.07 2.12–22.94 0.002
RAS mut 160 11.0 1.22 0.94–1.58 0.142 42.0 1.47 1.05–2.07 0.025
Sex
Male 192 12.2 1 53.8 1
Female 117 10.7 0.98 0.75–1.28 0.878 40.7 1.19 0.85–1.68 0.313
Age
<65 years 177 11.7 1 52.8 1
⩾65 years 132 11.4 1.09 0.84–1.41 0.526 46.6 1.17 0.84–1.64 0.349
ECOG PS
0 267 12.2 1 54.0 1
1–2 42 9.4 1.38 0.96–2.16 0.076 26.5 1.95 1.42–3.95 0.001
Primary tumour site
Left colon 138 12.0 1 57.3 1
Right colon 87 10.7 1.23 0.91–1.69 0.179 35.5 1.59 1.10–2.45 0.017
Rectum 82 12.6 1.04 0.76–1.43 0.794 61.1 0.95 0.63–1.43 0.804
Liver only
Yes 281 12.6 1 53.8 1
No 28 7.5 1.92 1.41–4.20 0.001 25.5 2.22 1.57–6.43 0.001
Unilobar mts
Yes 198 15.1 1 61.1 1
No 111 7.9 1.55 1.22–2.13 0.0009 34.8 1.59 1.16–2.33 0.006
Time to mts
Metachronous 101 15.1 1 56.8 1
Synchronous 208 10.4 1.48 1.11–1.89 0.006 48.7 1.30 0.91–1.82 0.158
Resection outcome
R0 258 14.2 1 61.1 1
R1/R2-Expl. Lapar. 51 6.3 2.39 2.27–5.44 <0.0001 21.6 3.21 3.66–10.85 <0.0001
Primary lymph nodes
No 96 17.7 1 56.8 1
Yes 206 10.4 1.58 1.17–2.00 0.002 51.9 1.35 0.94–1.89 0.107
DFI <12 months
Yes 242 10.7 1 47.0 1
No 67 17.1 0.67 0.52–0.93 0.015 61.1 0.80 0.54–1.21 0.312
>1 liver mts
No 132 16.8 1 69.3 1
Yes 173 8.8 1.76 1.36–2.27 <0.0001 36.0 1.84 1.30–2.49 0.0005
Mts diameter >5 cm
No 231 11.7 1 56.8 1
Yes 62 11.2 1.13 0.82–1.58 0.437 52.7 1.19 0.79–1.85 0.396
CEA>200 ng ml−1
No 212 11.0 1 46.6 1
Yes 9 9.0 1.21 0.54–2.82 0.620 17.5 2.40 1.24–12.11 0.021
Clinical risk scorea
Low 138 16.6 1 58.6 1
High 137 8.6 1.75 1.35–2.35 <0.0001 35.5 1.65 1.16–2.35 0.005

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; DFI=disease-free interval; Expl. Lapar.=explorative laparotomy; HR=hazard ratio; mts=metastasis; mut=mutant; N=number; PS=performance status; wt=wild-type.

a

Clinical risk score is defined as previously described by Fong et al (1999): patients with 0 to 2 risk features were categorised as ‘low risk', while those with 3 to 5 features as ‘high risk'. Bold entries indicate significant results.